Mathias,
In XMPP, the server is responsible of broadcasting presence for the client.
There is no support in any implementation of the jabber servers for
splitting this broadcasting according to groups. Nor is there currently
support for multiple roster list.
So in the present state of the
hi paul
in fact the yahoo transport can not support the japanese word , just
like ICQ 7 , how to :-( deal it i? I yet can not find a way to deal
yahoo transport to let it support japanese yahoo server ,
Paul Curtis wrote:
SARADHI wrote:
and now itself wiht the latest Tranport installed
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 11:05:55PM -0500, Christopher Smith wrote:
Finally got tkabber working on my OSX machine. However, I am having
some trouble finding docs on how to make a custom set of keymappings
for that will suit my machine.
If someone can point me to a doc or give me some
zhang wrote:
hi paul
in fact the yahoo transport can not support the japanese word , just
like ICQ 7 , how to :-( deal it i? I yet can not find a way to deal
yahoo transport to let it support japanese yahoo server ,
You can configure the server and charmap the transport is using in its
hello, i was wondering what is wrong
with the protocol that it can't take dynamic IP's ? Jabber server, thus moving Jabber closer to a
peer-to-peer model (currently this would require each device to have its own
fully qualified domain name). I really would like to implement a p2p jabber
The location of a server is determined by DNS, and thus servers changing
IPs will cause loss of messages.
-David Waite
Daniel MD wrote:
hello, i was wondering what is wrong with the protocol that it can't
take dynamic IP's ? Jabber server, thus moving Jabber closer to a
peer-to-peer model
H
I seem to be making progress but I do not understand why:) Perhaps someone can explain what is going on. In the IQ callback, I can get the first item in the roster by referencing it as follows with the Net::Jabber 1.0028 pm release.
my @query = $iq-GetQuery();print ("name = ",
At 04:13 PM 1/27/2003 -0700, you wrote:
Daniel MD wrote:
hello, i was wondering what is wrong with the protocol that it can't take
dynamic IP's ? Jabber server, thus moving Jabber closer to a
peer-to-peer model (currently this would require each device to have its
own fully qualified
