Re: [jdev] Clock system to fallow discussion

2005-09-05 Thread Alexey Nezhdanov
Monday, 05 Spetember 2005 09:02 Trejkaz wrote: Quoting Alexey Nezhdanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: There is a feature I would really like to see in jabber, it's a clock system to specify to which message you reply to. This system has been used succesfully for years in tribune like

Re: [jdev] Clock system to fallow discussion

2005-09-05 Thread Trejkaz
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 22:56, Hal Rottenberg wrote: On 9/5/05, Trejkaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, it would be better to use message IDs than timestamps. Those demos highlight the problem reasonably well: when you have multiple messages at the same time and someone replies to one message,

Re: [jdev] Clock system to fallow discussion

2005-09-05 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Hal Rottenberg wrote: On 9/5/05, Trejkaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, it would be better to use message IDs than timestamps. Those demos highlight the problem reasonably well: when you have multiple messages at the same time and someone replies to one message, you can't tell which message

Re: [jdev] Clock system to fallow discussion

2005-09-05 Thread Trejkaz
Quoting Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If clients recognize the message IDs, they could also include an In-Reply-To SHIM header as described in JEP-0131 and include the message ID there. Here's the problem though. Presumably the MUC service, operating as a component, has to assign new