Dne neděle 05 únor 2006 08:49 Trejkaz napsal(a):
Hi all.
I've been looking at knocking together a simple privacy list management
webapp, which might eventually be of use for all those poor people whose
clients don't support it directly.
One of the things I just noticed is that ejabberd
On Sunday 05 February 2006 19:52, Michal Vaner (Vorner) wrote:
Dne neděle 05 únor 2006 08:49 Trejkaz napsal(a):
Hi all.
I've been looking at knocking together a simple privacy list management
webapp, which might eventually be of use for all those poor people whose
clients don't support
Dne neděle 05 únor 2006 10:59 Trejkaz napsal(a):
On Sunday 05 February 2006 19:52, Michal Vaner (Vorner) wrote:
Dne neděle 05 únor 2006 08:49 Trejkaz napsal(a):
Hi all.
I've been looking at knocking together a simple privacy list management
webapp, which might eventually be of use
On Sunday 05 February 2006 21:52, Michal Vaner (Vorner) wrote:
So basically what you're saying is, the only way to find out is to try
and then get an error, because:
1) a server might be 100% XMPP compliant, and simply allow the privacy
list feature to be disabled, or;
Then the
В сообщении от Воскресенье 05 Февраль 2006 14:09 Trejkaz написал(a):
On Sunday 05 February 2006 21:52, Michal Vaner (Vorner) wrote:
So basically what you're saying is, the only way to find out is to try
and then get an error
I propose next logic:
1) Since only 100% XMPP compliant servers
On Sunday 05 February 2006 22:54, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
В сообщении от Воскресенье 05 Февраль 2006 14:09 Trejkaz написал(a):
On Sunday 05 February 2006 21:52, Michal Vaner (Vorner) wrote:
So basically what you're saying is, the only way to find out is to
try and then get an error
I
В сообщении от Воскресенье 05 Февраль 2006 15:42 Trejkaz написал(a):
On Sunday 05 February 2006 22:54, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
В сообщении от Воскресенье 05 Февраль 2006 14:09 Trejkaz написал(a):
On Sunday 05 February 2006 21:52, Michal Vaner (Vorner) wrote:
So basically what you're
On 05 Feb 2006, at 13:42, Trejkaz wrote:
- If the feature is present, then privacy is available.
- If the version is not 1.0, then privacy is not available.
- Otherwise, try and retreive the privacy lists to see if it's
available.
Personally, i just retrieve my lists, and if that
what about contacting the jabphone [1] guys too?
[1] http://www.jabphone.com/
On 2/5/06, zhaomin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Hal:
I am looking for a developer to build a IM software that can used the SIP
protocol as voice communication with XMPP like Google talking. We can
Keep in mind that the MUST features in the RFC's are mandatory-to-
implement, not mandatory-to-deploy. It's perfectly possible for an
XMPP-compliant server to be configured by an admin that doesn't want
to allow privacy lists for policy reasons, and still be an XMPP-
compliant server.
The
Bart van Bragt jabber at vanbragt.com writes:
Pedro Melo wrote:
In case you missed it: http://jabphone.com/
I wonder what they are using to translate jingle signaling into SIP
signaling? An asterisk plugin of some sort? :)
Just saw this on #jabber on freenode.net (yes, that's IRC
On 2/6/06, Samuel T. Cossette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are planing to add sip-out (free as beer indeed) and the famous
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is in the stack.
If you made it [EMAIL PROTECTED] then you could just run 'mr' as
a component, and it would make you life much easier than trying to add
Yes. and for both
Regards,
Jhune
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:20:09 +0530
From: Vinod Panicker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [jdev] Jabber(PHP) thru proxy connection
To: Jabber software development list jdev@jabber.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
13 matches
Mail list logo
