Re: [jdev] registries in XML?

2006-03-15 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Would developers like the registries maintained by the Jabber Registrar > to be available in XML? Right now they are available only in HTML, but > the native formats are XML, which is more machine-readable. Just say the > wor

Re: [jdev] Options for Production/Industry quality sdk or framework for - implementing a client -

2006-03-15 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Igor Goryachev wrote: > On 15 Mar 2006, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>> * Maybe a built in extension for guaranteed delivery, since I could >>> locate a JEP extension for this. >> I may write a JEP about this soon (an extension to JEP-0079). > > Wow! It

RE: [jdev] Options for Production/Industry quality sdk orframeworkfor - implementing a client -

2006-03-15 Thread JD Conley
In the chat room scenario you could use private messaging. You could send a message that is not of type groupchat to the full JID of the room user for your ACKS: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/usernickname Then the whole room would not see all of them. If you had a generic ACK mechanism using message stanzas t

RE: [jdev] Options for Production/Industry quality sdk or frameworkfor - implementing a client -

2006-03-15 Thread Dwarapudi, Vijay
IP delivery - and retransmit is handled within network layers, based on the protocol you pick, this isolates me from worrying about packets. In the same way, I was wondering if I could not worry about loosing packets at the application level... and XMPP would worry about any lost packets, over a s

RE: [jdev] Options for Production/Industry quality sdk or framework for- implementing a client -

2006-03-15 Thread JD Conley
There is a list available online: http://www.jabber.org/software/libraries.shtml   If you're looking for .NET there are three other options: jabber-net, agsXMPP, and one from IP*Works. The IP*Works one is simplified quite a bit, but I'm not sure if they have the level of functionality you're

Re: [jdev] Options for Production/Industry quality sdk or framework for - implementing a client -

2006-03-15 Thread Igor Goryachev
On 15 Mar 2006, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> * Maybe a built in extension for guaranteed delivery, since I could >> locate a JEP extension for this. > > I may write a JEP about this soon (an extension to JEP-0079). Wow! It sounds great! :-D > But different people mean different things by "guarante

Re: [jdev] Options for Production/Industry quality sdk or framework for - implementing a client -

2006-03-15 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dwarapudi, Vijay wrote: > * Maybe a built in extension for guaranteed delivery, since I could > locate a JEP extension for this. I may write a JEP about this soon (an extension to JEP-0079). But different people mean different things by "gu

[jdev] Options for Production/Industry quality sdk or framework for - implementing a client -

2006-03-15 Thread Dwarapudi, Vijay
I am on a short deadline to pick out a framework to implement an XMPP client. So any feedback/ experience or options on different client side vendors for building a client that talks XMPP would be appreciated.   The client purpose is to facilitate machines chatting alerts, relaying alert