21 apr 2006 kl. 20.26 skrev Michal Vaner (Vorner):
Hi,
Dne pátek 21 duben 2006 19:49 Magnus Henoch napsal(a):
I haven't looked at it myself but Telepathy might be a place to
start:
http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/wiki/
My god, not another DBus monster! :-O
Using D-Bus doesn't by itself
Dnia 23-04-2006, nie o godzinie 20:51 +0200, Asia Gąsiewska napisał(a):
Is this how it should work?
I won't dare to analyse your algorithm (especially without the source
code), but you can take a look at my .NET implementation. It does not
handle ISO 8859-1 nor multiple challenges (thanks for
Hello, Justin!
Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:04:56 -0800 you wrote:
JK As far as I know, the GnuPG developers intentially don't provide a DLL
JK form of the program. This is why even GPGME (GnuPG Made Easy, the
JK official library for apps to use) calls gpg.exe behind the scenes.
Yep, probably
On 4/24/06, George Hazan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even on a PIV/2800 with 1GB RAM it takes about 200-300 msec to launch the
gnupg.exe and process its result. Such a delay itself is a mess for a user
who can type quickly.
hear, hear.
--
- Norman Rasmussen
- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Home
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 04:52:33PM +0400, George Hazan wrote:
Hello, Justin!
Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:04:56 -0800 you wrote:
JK As far as I know, the GnuPG developers intentially don't provide a DLL
JK form of the program. This is why even GPGME (GnuPG Made Easy, the
JK official library for
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 05:52:29PM +0400, George Hazan wrote:
Hello, Michal!
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:46:59 +0200 you wrote:
Even on a PIV/2800 with 1GB RAM it takes about 200-300 msec to launch the
gnupg.exe and process its result.
MvV Than the system (windows) should be rewritten, not the
On Monday 24 April 2006 05:52, George Hazan wrote:
Yep, probably because that EXE should be completely rewritten to allow to
use the existing code as DLL.. For example, right now it uses global
varibles instead of context structures. That's why I was looking for a
brave guy :=)
I believe
Hello, Michal!
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:17:47 +0200 you wrote:
Even on a PIV/2800 with 1GB RAM it takes about 200-300 msec to launch
the gnupg.exe and process its result.
MvV Than the system (windows) should be rewritten, not the program.
If the antivirus usage is a corporate policy, you can't
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:09:53PM +0400, George Hazan wrote:
Hello, Michal!
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:17:47 +0200 you wrote:
Even on a PIV/2800 with 1GB RAM it takes about 200-300 msec to launch
the gnupg.exe and process its result.
MvV Than the system (windows) should be rewritten, not the
Hi,
BouncyCastle (BC) is supposed to handle PGP.
If you don't mind interfacing to a Java library, you could let BC
handle your encryption on the fly.
http://www.bouncycastle.org
Regards,
Cedric
Le 24 avr. 06 à 20:47, Michal vorner Vaner a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:09:53PM +0400,
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 01:17, Michal vorner Vaner wrote:
it obeys one of the unix rules - one task = one program.
Any instant messaging application which implements voice or video chat already
disobeys this rule, so I don't think people should stick too strongly to it.
I do not thing the
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 04:47, Michal vorner Vaner wrote:
Anyway, GPG was designed to run under UNIX systems, where launching a
binary is really fast (it has to be, since many good application use
external programs for different actions, which menas configurability and
not duplexing of code)
12 matches
Mail list logo
