Re: [jdev] parsing xml (xmpp) with ruby

2008-09-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
(Please Cc me, I don't follow jdev very closely) On 30/09/08 at 09:30 -0400, Eric Will wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Eric Will <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Okay, I implemented a SAX parser. It now goes through the tags until it gets > > to a partial one, and then raises an exception

Re: [jdev] parsing xml (xmpp) with ruby

2008-09-30 Thread Jonathan Dickinson
I can give you a XML parser in C# that you can port. I have had no problems with it so far and I have been using it for a couple of months. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Stephan Maka > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 2:40 AM > To

Re: [jdev] parsing xml (xmpp) with ruby

2008-09-30 Thread Stephan Maka
Eric Will wrote: > It doesn't complain about a partial file. If I pass it a partial > stanza, with say the end tag only halfway finished, like " raises an exception. The exception tells me nothing that I can use to > isolate the incomplete stanza and save it to be appended onto later. > > I feed i

[jdev] jabber server integration consulting work

2008-09-30 Thread Anand Panthagani
Hi, I am looking for some consulting help to integrate jabber into our web site. If you are interested in this project and earn some money please contact me asap Thank you ___ JDev mailing list FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jde

Re: [jdev] parsing xml (xmpp) with ruby

2008-09-30 Thread Michal 'vorner' Vaner
Hello On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:42:13AM -0400, Eric Will wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Remko Tronçon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmm, how can a SAX parser complain about a partial XML file? SAX *is* > > incremental. It would probably help if you described in a high level > > how yo

Re: [jdev] SIMPLE or XMPP?

2008-09-30 Thread Dave Cridland
On Tue Sep 30 17:28:14 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My question is: Is it possible that the UDP version of SIMPLE could > be > more bandwidth efficient than XMPP over TCP for the conveyance of > presence > information? Evidently SIMPLE is more verbose than XMPP, however > UDP is a > much

[jdev] SIMPLE or XMPP?

2008-09-30 Thread aragalo
Hi, I would like to thank everybody for their feedback and assistance so far. My question is: Is it possible that the UDP version of SIMPLE could be more bandwidth efficient than XMPP over TCP for the conveyance of presence information? Evidently SIMPLE is more verbose than XMPP, however UDP is a

Re: [jdev] parsing xml (xmpp) with ruby

2008-09-30 Thread Eric Will
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Remko Tronçon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, how can a SAX parser complain about a partial XML file? SAX *is* > incremental. It would probably help if you described in a high level > how your parser works, how you feed it data, ... It doesn't complain about a pa

Re: [jdev] parsing xml (xmpp) with ruby

2008-09-30 Thread Remko Tronçon
> Okay, I implemented a SAX parser. It now goes through the tags until > it gets to a partial one, and then raises an exception. The exception > gives me zero information that I can use to cache the incomplete tag. Hmm, how can a SAX parser complain about a partial XML file? SAX *is* incremental.

Re: [jdev] parsing xml (xmpp) with ruby

2008-09-30 Thread Eric Will
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Eric Will <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, I implemented a SAX parser. It now goes through the tags until it gets > to a partial one, and then raises an exception. The exception gives me zero > information that I can use to cache the incomplete tag. REXML sucks.

[jdev] XMPP and Affero GPL (was: Announcing PubSubClient, a Python library for the client/entity side of XEP-0060)

2008-09-30 Thread Magnus Henoch
Chris Warburton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The library is licensed under the GNU Affero GPL. That's interesting :) Would an XMPP client licensed under the Affero GPL be required to offer its sources through file transfer, or something? -- Magnus JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _