On 30 April 2012 18:02, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 4/30/12 9:43 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
>> My eggs are in XEP-0186's basket. It would take an hour at most to
>> add support for it to Prosody, and it's likely as trivial for other
>> servers too. It also couldn't get any easier from the client's
On Apr 30, 2012, at 11:02, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 4/30/12 9:45 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>> On Mon Apr 30 17:17:12 2012, Daniel Dormont wrote:
>>> I've been asked to add invisibility to my XMPP-based application.
>>
>> I think the "right" thing is to use XEP-0186, but that's seen very
>> l
On 30 April 2012 18:02, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 4/30/12 9:45 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>> On Mon Apr 30 17:17:12 2012, Daniel Dormont wrote:
>>> I've been asked to add invisibility to my XMPP-based application.
>>
>> I think the "right" thing is to use XEP-0186, but that's seen very
>> limite
On 4/30/12 9:45 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Mon Apr 30 17:17:12 2012, Daniel Dormont wrote:
>> I've been asked to add invisibility to my XMPP-based application.
>
> I think the "right" thing is to use XEP-0186, but that's seen very
> limited support on the server.
>
> I'm increasingly finding s
On 4/30/12 9:43 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
> On 30 April 2012 17:17, Daniel Dormont
> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I've been asked to add invisibility to my XMPP-based application.
>> The server I'm running currently, ejabberd 2.1.x, supports XEP-0018
>> but I get the impression that relying on it is
On Mon Apr 30 17:17:12 2012, Daniel Dormont wrote:
I've been asked to add invisibility to my XMPP-based application.
I think the "right" thing is to use XEP-0186, but that's seen very
limited support on the server.
I'm increasingly finding some interesting use-cases for invisibility,
such
On 30 April 2012 17:17, Daniel Dormont wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been asked to add invisibility to my XMPP-based application. The server
> I'm running currently, ejabberd 2.1.x, supports XEP-0018 but I get the
> impression that relying on it is a bad idea. If I will be using clients that
> are
Hello all,
I've been asked to add invisibility to my XMPP-based application. The
server I'm running currently, ejabberd 2.1.x, supports XEP-0018 but I get
the impression that relying on it is a bad idea. If I will be using clients
that are mostly, but perhaps not entirely in some cases, under my o
We use MUC rooms extensively within our site. They offer us a number of neat
features that make them very useful. It gives us a central way to manage who
talks to who, can accommodate groups of people chatting and gives us a neat way
to deal with keeping a history of everything.
However we've s
