On 21 August 2013 22:15, Dave Cridland wrote:
> If we're going to be really pedantic about this - and obviously I'm going to
> be...
In summary: As far as applications are concerned, TCP connections are
always streams of bytes, not of packets. Anyone pretending anything
different is doing it Wron
If we're going to be really pedantic about this - and obviously I'm going
to be...
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Peter Mount wrote:
> Yes it is possible as it's an xml stream not a packet based protocol.
>
First point of pedantry is that XMPP is a packet-switched network layer.
Just that its
Hey Alex, Magnus,
Indeed the problem was already reported there. It seems that it does not
occur with beta.chat.facebook.com which is going to be put in production in
about a week or so.
Emil
--sent from my mobile
On 21 Aug 2013 08:59, "Alexander Gnauck" wrote:
> Hello Magnus,
>
> you can reac
On 20 Aug 2013 09:48, "Ashley Ward" wrote:
>
> On 15 Aug 2013, at 14:33, Dave Cridland wrote:
> > PS - I would personally consider a different XMPP server - Openfire
didn't seem to be actively maintained last I looked, whereas Prosody,
ejabberd, MongooseIM, M-Link, and Soapbox all have active dev
