On 30 April 2015 at 22:08, Goffi wrote:
> Thanks for you answer Dave (and Adrien),
>
> So we can talk about federation for different protocol (if I add a gateway
> to my server, I add a federation with the legacy network), right ?
>
>
Interesting thought.
We normally refer simply to "gatewaying"
On 30 April 2015 at 13:48, Adrien wrote:
> On 04/30/2015 12:54 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>
>> On 30 April 2015 at 11:23, Goffi wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> - federated: the ability from servers of different domains (
>>> example.net and capulet.lit) to talk together, in both directions.
>>>
>>
Thanks for you answer Dave (and Adrien),
So we can talk about federation for different protocol (if I add a
gateway to my server, I add a federation with the legacy network), right ?
On 30/04/2015 12:54, Dave Cridland wrote:
On 30 April 2015 at 11:23, Goffi mailto:go...@goffi.org>> wrote:
I have setup the membership application Wiki page for the application
period Q3 2015
Applications are encouraged from developers and others who are actively
involved in the Jabber/XMPP community. To apply, create a page about
yourself on the Wiki:
http://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Membership_Applicati
On 04/30/2015 12:54 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On 30 April 2015 at 11:23, Goffi wrote:
[...]
- federated: the ability from servers of different domains (
example.net and capulet.lit) to talk together, in both directions.
Yes, or more generally, the ability for multiple disparate admin
On 30 April 2015 at 11:23, Goffi wrote:
> G'day,
>
> for years I have used decentralised, distributed, and federated with, in
> my head, the following meaning:
>
> - decentralised: the ability to have several servers communicating
> together, the servers can be under the same domain (exam
G'day,
for years I have used decentralised, distributed, and federated with, in
my head, the following meaning:
- decentralised: the ability to have several servers communicating
together, the servers can be under the same domain (example.net can have
several servers)
- distributed: 1 se
