> "Filip" == Filip Sielimowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Filip> On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, alex_ wrote:
>>
Filip> - Presences - sending statuses of users.
Filip> - Presences - adding new users, subscription and "UserAddedU" messages.
Filip> - this is not finished.
Filip> - Messages - Norm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "a" == admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
a> On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Matthias Wimmer wrote:
>>> I believe that JIDs are not case sensitive, but case should be retained
>>> for display.
>> The user and domain part is not case sensitive - the re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "RM" == Riyaad Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RM> Hi ALL
RM> Just recapping on old topic
RM> Is there a working version of this transport available yet for Jabber 1.4.1?
RM> If so ...please let me know where!
ICQv7-t (icqv7-t.sf.net)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "ML" == Michal Leinweber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ML> Why does ICQv7 Transport send every hour complete presence list of all ICQ
ML> buddies?
ask about it people from libicq2000 (libicq2000.sourceforge.net) project plz
- --
Regards, A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "KW" == Kimberly Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KW> Hello everyone,
KW> I performed a preliminary search through the archives and could not
KW> find any information on this, so please forgive me if I ask a question
KW> that has already b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
Let us suppose I have several persons in roster. And I'd like they
not to see my presence. Using ICQ-terminology it is an invisible list.
I think in accordance the jabber idealogy invisible lists should be
stored at server. For example a-l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "MAM" == Matthew A Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MAM> As part of the 1.4.2 version of jabberd, invisibility is considered a
MAM> "type" of presence.
MAM> For example, to tell the server you're invisible to everyone:
MAM>
MAM> Or, t
> "MW" == Matthias Wimmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MW> Hi Thomas!
MW> Thomas Muldowney wrote:
>> As far as I know (and after conferring with Julian) all the transports
>> currently interpret it as offline. So the users session to the remote
>> network is ended. If the remote networ
> "TM" == Thomas Muldowney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TM> Although that really strains the transports oddly since they kill the
TM> session and then immediately bring it back up.
I worked it around in ICQv7-t using dirty tricks with small timeouts
before really kill the session.
--
