but what about clients? are there any clients supporting it?
a good place to incorporate the functionality would be in the
different libraries out there...
/m
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 7:38 PM
Su
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: [JDEV] Idea!
> Clients don't need to care about this stuff, it's all internal to the
> server.
>
> Peter
>
> Marco Romeny wrote:
>
> > but what about clients? are ther
said it before, the client can still not find
the server without using MX/SRV-lookup.
another idea spawning from the previous
is to to have clients requesting a resolution
for mydomain.com.resolv.jabber.org which
could mimic SRV without portinfo.
the domain mydomain.com.resolv.jabber.org
could
somewhere on netscape's site is a description
on how signed applets work. what you do is that
you request additional priviliges ( socketpriv. or so)
and to be able to even request it, the applet need to
be signed _or_ be downloaded from a secured site.
I know mindterm (http://www.mindbright.co
if - that is feasible of course. easy on linux, but the rest?
what about support in the major client-libraries out there
for lookup of SVR? does anyone know?
- Original Message -
From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 14:34
Subject: R
don't have libraries for forwarding TCP ports???
>
> - Dave
>
>
> Marco Romeny wrote:
> >
> > if - that is feasible of course. easy on linux, but the rest?
> > what about support in the major client-libraries out there
> > for lookup of SVR? does anyone k
