Re: [jdev] Using XMPP to talk to a mobile client

2009-04-09 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Just to mention, BOSH does not have any same client IP requirement/restriction. And unlike tcp binding of xmpp - where session is terminated if disconnected, BOSH does handle disconnects in its design. The only requirements would be - a) ability of the client to connect back before the

Re: [jdev] Using XMPP to talk to a mobile client

2009-04-09 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
--- On Thu, 9/4/09, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote: From: Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im Subject: Re: [jdev] Using XMPP to talk to a mobile client To: Jabber/XMPP software development list jdev@jabber.org Date: Thursday, 9 April, 2009, 8:11 PM On 4/9/09 5:20 AM, Mridul

Re: [jdev] Ruby Jabber Server

2007-08-12 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Jonathan Chayce Dickinson wrote: That is very true, maybe I will give it a pet name. But as far as Linux goes, it's named for daemons (background services). and it's a Jabber daemon. JabberD was taken already, so RJabberD is natural. I am not going to call it xmppd, because, as I said, it is

[jdev] clients supporting ibb

2007-07-02 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Hi, I need to test file transfer of large files through ibb, can someone let me know which clients support this ? I should be able to disable all other modes of transfer and use only ibb. Thanks, Mridul

Re: [jdev] Escaping JID using XEP-0106

2007-06-27 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Sergei Golovan wrote: On 6/27/07, Norman Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/27/07, Sergei Golovan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're right. And the question is: How to escape it? Can escaping be done unambiguously? Yes, but only if you already know the split. So, a full unsecaped JID

Re: [jdev] Escaping JID using XEP-0106

2007-06-27 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Sergei Golovan wrote: On 6/27/07, Matthias Wimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthias Wimmer schrieb: The resource is allowed to contain '@' as well as '/'. Everything behind the first '/' character in a JID is the resource. ... but this has nothing to do with XEP-0106 BTW. XEP-0106 is

Re: [jdev] Escaping JID using XEP-0106

2007-06-27 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Sergei Golovan wrote: On 6/27/07, Mridul Muralidharan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is not about visual representation. xep 106 is about encoding pieces of the jid such that they are compliant with xmpp requirements in a standard way. Then I would like to ask who should escape JIDs and when? I

Re: [jdev] Different behaviors of ejabbered and openFire in pushing messages to the client!

2007-06-18 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Hi, I think Peter is in the process of clarifying the bis spec on the subscription appendix's. /me pokes psa :) It might be a good idea to wait for that to be complete ... currently, the state of specs is a bit icky from an impl point of view (though well defined). Roughly, 3921 says

[jdev] Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0211 (XMPP Basic Client 2008)

2007-05-30 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0211 (XMPP Basic Client 2008). Abstract: This document defines the XMPP Basic Client 2008 compliance level. URL: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0211.html This Last Call begins today and shall

[jdev] Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0216 (XMPP Intermediate IM Server 2008)

2007-05-30 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0216 (XMPP Intermediate IM Server 2008). Abstract: This document defines the XMPP Intermedate IM Server 2008 compliance level. URL: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0216.html This Last Call

Re: [jdev] Using JSO for component development

2006-05-18 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Christian Cantrell wrote: I'm using JSO to build a component, and I'm finding it more than a little confusing. I've posted to the JSO list, but it's pretty quiet, so I thought I'd try my luck here. Using JSO, I'm able to connect to my server, listen for specific packets, and return