Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam

2001-06-27 Thread Thomas Charron
When I say admin messages, I was speaking of system announcements, etc.. From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam > Sorry for the double negative :) I meant that you would ignore all messages from users that were not subscribed EXCEPT those administrative

Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam

2001-06-27 Thread Thomas Charron
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam > I suggest, then, that we store filter rules in a standard format on the private data store so that the same filter rules apply whenever any client logs in. We do.. It's called mod_filter, which takes place

Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam

2001-06-26 Thread DJ Adams
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 04:57:23PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I suggest, then, that we store filter rules in a standard format on the private data >store so that the same filter rules apply whenever any client logs in. > That's what happens right now (mod_filter). dj ___

RE: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam

2001-06-26 Thread Michael Bauer
Is this something best suited for JEP? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 2:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam I suggest, then, that we store filter rules in a standard format on the

Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam

2001-06-26 Thread johnston
t: Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam > > Well, someone correct me if I'm wrong... but for someone to receive your > presence, you have to permit them to subscribe to your presence. Can't we > tell the server not to accept certain message types (as in not presence > subscription

Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam

2001-06-26 Thread DJ Adams
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 03:31:24PM -0500, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > even attempting to send them to the client (although then of course we've > got a lot of processing going on at the server, which might cause a > significant performance hit). Although that still fits in with the design philosop

Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam

2001-06-26 Thread johnston
I suggest, then, that we store filter rules in a standard format on the private data store so that the same filter rules apply whenever any client logs in. Mat. ___ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev

Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam

2001-06-26 Thread Thomas Charron
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam > Well, someone correct me if I'm wrong... but for someone to receive your presence, you have to permit them to subscribe to your presence. Can't we tell the server not to accept certain message types

Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam

2001-06-26 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
tware Designer > Nuance Communications > Ottawa, Canada. > > www.nuance.com > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 3:52 PM > Subject: Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam > > &g

Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam

2001-06-26 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Many clients already support this, but they throw the messages out at the client level, not the server -- ideally we'd have a robust filtering mechanism on the server that would send this stuff to /dev/null before even attempting to send them to the client (although then of course we've got a lot

Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam

2001-06-26 Thread Ben Piercey
1 3:52 PM Subject: Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam > Well, someone correct me if I'm wrong... but for someone to receive your presence, you have to permit them to subscribe to your presence. Can't we tell the server not to accept certain message types (as in not presence subscription re

Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam

2001-06-26 Thread johnston
Well, someone correct me if I'm wrong... but for someone to receive your presence, you have to permit them to subscribe to your presence. Can't we tell the server not to accept certain message types (as in not presence subscription requests :) that come from users that don't have subscription a

Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam

2001-06-26 Thread Thomas Charron
s to prevent the transport stated above? - Original Message - From: "Adam Theo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "jdev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 1:39 AM Subject: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam > so, what ideas are there already about fighting

Re: [JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam

2001-06-26 Thread Thomas Parslow (PatRat)
> Hello, Adam Theo here; > i just saw an episode of TechTV's CyberCrime, about cell phone text > messaging spam, and want to see what i can do to make sure the same > doesn't happen to jabber. i despise spam, hate it, want it to manifest > into something physical so i can mangle it, rip it, crus

[JDEV] Fighting Jabber Spam

2001-06-25 Thread Adam Theo
Hello, Adam Theo here; i just saw an episode of TechTV's CyberCrime, about cell phone text messaging spam, and want to see what i can do to make sure the same doesn't happen to jabber. i despise spam, hate it, want it to manifest into something physical so i can mangle it, rip it, crush it... to