> One thing though, once the conversation has been snooped on, isn't the
> security already totally compromised?
It's a reasomable goal for any system to ensure that passive traffic sniffing
does not compromise the security, As was mentioned earlier, SSL, PGP, and
0K authentication can help assi
On Sunday, April 8, 2001, at 08:04 AM, Thomas Parslow (PatRat) wrote:
This question was asked about a week ago I think, the answer given was
that the limit for an XML node is 500k.
I would have thought sending anything over a few k would cause a big
problem for users with very slow connections (w
--Original Message-
> From: Thomas Parslow (PatRat) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 4:23 AM
> To: Robert Temple
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] RE: File Transfer [was buddy icons]
>
>
> Just been rereading the protocol docs: your right, I'm wrong :)
>
> Catching the tail end of this - and related "sending SVG" post...
>
> Is there a limit for sending text info inside a message? Not thinking of
> anything huge, but small images or other appropriately encoded data?
This question was asked about a week ago I think, the answer given was
that the l
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001 12:23:26 +0100
> To: Robert Temple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] RE: File Transfer [was buddy icons]
>
> Just been rereading the protocol docs: your right, I'm wrong :)
>
> One thing though, once th
Just been rereading the protocol docs: your right, I'm wrong :)
One thing though, once the conversation has been snooped on, isn't the
security already totally compromised?
Thomas Parslow (PatRat) ICQ #:26359483
Rat Software
http://www.rat-software.com/
Please leave quoted text in place when rep
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Parslow (PatRat) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Subject: Re[2]: [JDEV] Buddy icons & File Transfer
>
>>
>> Instead, I think I'll just build another mini-web server or maybe
>> an NSAPI or ISAPI DLL that both senders and recipients will connect
>> to si
