Re: [JDEV] Re: [Gabber] Is gabber dead?

2003-01-17 Thread Mikael Hallendal
ons 2003-01-15 klockan 21.07 skrev Peter Saint-Andre: On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Mantas [ISO-8859-13] Kriauèiûnas wrote: Hi, I see no news and no messages about gabber development :( Is this excellent project dead ? I hope not and I wait 0.8.8 version with impatience (0.8.7 crashes

[JDEV] Re: [Gabber] Is gabber dead?

2003-01-15 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Mantas [ISO-8859-13] Kriauèiûnas wrote: Hi, I see no news and no messages about gabber development :( Is this excellent project dead ? I hope not and I wait 0.8.8 version with impatience (0.8.7 crashes to me often, when there are problems with internet connection)

Re:[JDEV] Re: [Gabber] Is gabber dead?

2003-01-15 Thread Tijl Houtbeckers
Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15-1-2003 21:07:45: On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Mantas [ISO-8859-13] Kriauèiûnas wrote: Hi, I see no news and no messages about gabber development :( Is this excellent project dead ? I hope not and I wait 0.8.8 version with impatience (0.8.7

Re:[JDEV] Re: [Gabber] Is gabber dead?

2003-01-15 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Obviously you have not kept track of development efforts. Exodus is actually quite new and well-architected. You must be confusing it with the old Winjab project. Exodus is a totally new client by the same author, and a fine example of a modern Jabber client + library. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre

Re: [JDEV] Re: [Gabber] Is gabber dead?

2003-01-15 Thread Russell Davis
or you could run exodus under wine. works really nicely and not a single byte would need to be harmed in the process On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 15:07, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Mantas [ISO-8859-13] Kriauèiûnas wrote: Hi, I see no news and no messages about gabber

Re: [JDEV] Re: [Gabber] Is gabber dead?

2003-01-15 Thread Adrian Rapa
hmm, can u tell me how to run it? i dont manage to do this. Adrian - Original Message - From: Russell Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:43 PM Subject: Re: [JDEV] Re: [Gabber] Is gabber dead? or you could run exodus under wine. works

Re: [JDEV] Re: [Gabber] Is gabber dead?

2003-01-15 Thread Thomas Muldowney
I can't say yay or nay on another gabber1 release, that's up to Julian, but... Gabber2 is under development. I'm currently in the midst of prototyping it, in python, in JS CVS. People are welcome to play with it, but it's probably a pain to get going because you have to compile the JabberOO/Judo

Re: [JDEV] Re: [Gabber] Is gabber dead?

2003-01-15 Thread Russell Davis
- From: Russell Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:43 PM Subject: Re: [JDEV] Re: [Gabber] Is gabber dead? or you could run exodus under wine. works really nicely and not a single byte would need to be harmed in the process On Wed, 2003-01-15

Re:[JDEV] Re: [Gabber] Is gabber dead?

2003-01-15 Thread Tijl Houtbeckers
Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15-1-2003 22:17:31: Obviously you have not kept track of development efforts. Exodus is actually quite new and well-architected. You must be confusing it with the old Winjab project. Exodus is a totally new client by the same author, and a fine

Re: [JDEV] Re: [Gabber] Is gabber dead?

2003-01-15 Thread Clayton Haapala
Has anybody worked with wxWindows for such clients? Should be *ix/Windows cross-compatible. I've only seen the Mahogany mail UA which is done with it. -- Clay Haapala ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]