This is one of the exact goals of the Foundation, to have a formalized
process for working on the protocol. Jabelin will then be the group to
work on server development. Some more info about this should be out
today or tomorrow.
--temas
On 11 May 2001 08:50:50 -0500, Iain Shigeoka wrote:
At
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:37:22PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
temas wrote:
This is one of the exact goals of the Foundation, to have a formalized
process for working on the protocol. Jabelin will then be the group to
work on server development. Some more info about this should be
]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Implementing Jabber Server in other Languages (Was RE:
[JDEV] Cus tomizing Jabber server)
5/9/01 8:03:42 AM, Matt Diez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really don't see implementation of Jabber in other
languages as being
It seems like the prototyping point here is the strongest. From a perf
perspective, C/C++ all the way seems pretty important for carriers and
large
ISPs (like us if I may be so bold), but not for people tooling around with
new features... If we all agree with this, the nice thing might be
I personally (and I believe jer too) would love love love to see the
server implemented in other languages. The more options available the
stronger I can see the growth of Jabber as a whole. The whole reason we
have a common protocol is so we can have many servers. Yes, some of the
servers may
PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [JDEV] RE: Implementing Jabber Server in other Languages
(Was RE: [JDEV] Cus tomizing Jabber server)
___
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev