At the moment it's difficult to locate working servers in any way shape
or form. I've only managed to find a couple of companies who have
servers available for testing against.
I've not heard any details about a reference implementation, so it may
be a case of shooting in the dark for a bit.
Al.
On 2/18/02 2:08 PM, "Al Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not saying either is great or bad, I'm just saying both have aimed
> at different goals, and that I think we could probably do ourselves a
> lot of favours by linking into a protocol that has openly available
> specs.
Do you know i
I think there are some very important differences between WV and Jabber
that stem from their design criteria, and that any naming similarities
is purely down to common sense being applied in both. The main
differences that come to mind are;
Firstly the use of transactions. Jabber uses the attribu
One should keep in mind that the WV spec is meant to be used on wireless
handsets, primarely cellular phones, with SMS and WAP as a bearer.
And trying to type instant messages that are longer that 100-150 characters
becomes quickly cumbersome...
What is interrested however, is that this spec has
