Another standard that might be considered for this is XUL.
>From: DJ Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [JDEV] forms
>Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 17:10:59 +0100
>
>On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 05:54:46PM +0200, Seba
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:48 PM
> Subject: [JDEV] forms
>
>
> > As I was taking notes at JabberCon, one theme that kept popping into my
> > mind was the need for
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 05:54:46PM +0200, Sebastiaan 'CBAS' Deckers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> IMO, the forms JEP are incredibly simplistic.
> I honestly don't see how one could build a decent form (I mean the layout)
> with the scheme you suggested, only a long list of input fields/boxes/etc.
> Why sho
useful.
Bye,
Sebastiaan
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Saint-Andre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:48 PM
Subject: [JDEV] forms
> As I was taking notes at JabberCon, one theme that kept popping
As I was taking notes at JabberCon, one theme that kept popping into my
mind was the need for strong forms support in Jabber. Just as the World
Wide Web consisted mostly of reading hyperlinked documents (albeit
eventually with some flashy graphics and multimedia stuff) until web
developers figured
