Hello, We have been measuring performance on a regular basis with Tsung. It is not extremely easy to use but does the job. It was mostly designed for own use, so that explains that it could be a bit rough around the edges.
I am not sure what is the goal of the project but this is another option for performance testing and measurement. I hope this helps, -- Mickaël Rémond http://www.process-one.net/ > Le 12 mars 2015 à 14:00, Florian Schmaus <f...@geekplace.eu> a écrit : > >> On 12.03.2015 12:19, Kevin Smith wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >>> On 4 Mar 2015, at 18:07, Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote: >>> Mentors: I need your teaser ideas please (Thanks to Simon for getting his >>> up)! >> >> I’ve just done an audit of the ideas page for teaser tasks as student >> applications are about to start. There was only one project that didn’t have >> any teasers, which I’ve removed. > > Thanks Kev. > > Given that the removed project was the "XMPP servers performance > comparator", I'd like to point out that the Tigase people provide a test > suite at http://www.tigase.net/content/tigase-testsuite > > I've just discovered the test suite yesterday, so I can't really comment > on it. But if someone wants such a suite in the future, it's sure better > evaluating using an existing framework, instead of re-inventing the wheel. > > Smack will get some integration tests soon too. Every test result will > also have it's timing information recorded. So in theory those tests > could be used for performance comparison too. But the focus is > integration testing, and not performance tests. That said, nothing > prevents one to write tests which focus on performance using the Smack > Integration Test Framework. > > The same may be true for the Tigase Testsuite. > > - Florian > _______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org _______________________________________________
