'Bonjour' Mathias,
Ok, thanks guys So now I 'm gonna use stringprep, but there is an
implementation of stringprep with such profiles in jabberd 2 project
please ? I'm looking for it in files until someone will help me...
Have a nice day,
Matthias Wimmer wrote:
Hi Trejkaz!
Trejkaz
files seem to be in idn/...
Remy HAREL wrote:
'Bonjour' Mathias,
Ok, thanks guys So now I 'm gonna use stringprep, but there is an
implementation of stringprep with such profiles in jabberd 2 project
please ? I'm looking for it in files until someone will help me...
Have a nice day,
Hi Trejkaz!
Trejkaz Xaoza schrieb am 2004-05-08 10:01:57:
Therefore md5(lowercase(jid_full)) would result in
the same hash for two different addresses!
That's actually a property of all hashes anyway. Comes with the territory of
reducing Y bytes to X bytes where X Y.
No not really. Sure
Hi all,
Still in my project to make jabberd 2 an high availibility
application, I'm currently adding datas in xmpp packets. These datas are
MD5 hashed, and among these data there is the full_jid ( i.e. :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Gabber for example ).
The main problem is to know which of
Subject: [jdev] Case sensitive jid
Hi all,
Still in my project to make jabberd 2 an high availibility
application, I'm currently adding datas in xmpp packets. These datas are
MD5 hashed, and among these data there is the full_jid ( i.e. :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Gabber for example
Hi Remy!
Remy HAREL schrieb am 2004-05-07 14:46:01:
Still in my project to make jabberd 2 an high availibility
application, I'm currently adding datas in xmpp packets. These datas are
MD5 hashed, and among these data there is the full_jid ( i.e. :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Gabber for example ).
Hi Dov!
Katz, Dov B (IT) schrieb am 2004-05-07 08:47:24:
It is my experience in Jorg 1.4.2 that only the resource is case
sensitive. If I'm wrong, please correct me.
This is true up to version 1.4.3, right. But it's wrong according to
xmpp-core and has been changed in CVS.
Tot kijk
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;)
I don't understand why I would have to use x-prep profiles, I make the
md5 sum of the jid_full(sess-jid) and it works fine. Yet, my problem is
to know if [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Gabber and [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Gabber
are the same users or not. If they are, my md5 sum is
Hi Remy!
Remy HAREL schrieb am 2004-05-07 17:14:08:
I don't understand why I would have to use x-prep profiles, I make the
md5 sum of the jid_full(sess-jid) and it works fine. Yet, my problem is
to know if [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Gabber and [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Gabber
are the same users or not. If
On Sat, 8 May 2004 01:37, Matthias Wimmer wrote:
Therefore md5(lowercase(jid_full)) would result in
the same hash for two different addresses!
That's actually a property of all hashes anyway. Comes with the territory of
reducing Y bytes to X bytes where X Y.
But as normal impelemtations of
10 matches
Mail list logo