On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 15:35, Vinod Panicker wrote:
> Any thoughts on this anyone?
Try xmpp-wg perhaps? Most people here aren't interested in defining a
protocol version which doesn't exist.
TX
--
Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Web site: http://trypticon.org/
Any thoughts on this anyone?
I know I'm being pedantic here ;)
On 8/10/05, Vinod Panicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> RFC 3920 states that -
>
>4. If either entity receives a stream header with no 'version'
>attribute, the entity MUST consider the version supported by the
