this just in : Breakthrough for Quantum Measurement
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/23/0417246
On 11/23/05, Sander Devrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op maandag 21 november 2005 02:00, schreef Fabrício Cabeça:
snip
Lightspeed is not enough for an interplanetary
Hi,
I guess we should accept light speed as a limit. That's not the question. The
question is rather: which protocols are appropriate for IM in the face of light
lag. And the answer is: protocols without round trips. In this respect Jabber
is better than SMTP, because it does not require a
Op maandag 21 november 2005 02:00, schreef Fabrício Cabeça:
snip
Lightspeed is not enough for an interplanetary instant-messaging system. A
long time ago I was talking with my physics bachelor friend and he
suggested the use of small particles spin, i.e. when you force an electron
to chance
Trejkaz schrieb:
Lightspeed is not enough for an interplanetary instant-messaging system.
Why are we all talking about this anyway? Are people running out of ideas
for April 1, 2006? :-)
Anyway, I suspect that instant messaging is the least of your problems
with coping
I think the idea is that you entangle them locally, and then ship one
of them to the destination via traditional rocket transportation.
On 11/21/05, Ulrich Staudinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trejkaz schrieb:
Lightspeed is not enough for an interplanetary instant-messaging system.
Why are
Trejkaz trejkaz at trypticon.org writes:
On Sunday 20 November 2005 10:04, Ulrich Staudinger wrote:
Fundamentally spoken, i think the message itself doesn't get old from A
to B (it travels at almost lightspeed). And once arrived the message
will be delivered immediately and
Lightspeed is not enough for an interplanetary instant-messaging system.
Why are we all talking about this anyway? Are people running out of ideas
for April 1, 2006? :-)
Anyway, I suspect that instant messaging is the least of your problems
with coping with interplanetary distances. Imagine
