RE: [JDEV] Jabber DevZone News - IM Unified

2001-06-05 Thread Michael Bauer
There was a little miscommunication. This is not available as open source. -Original Message- From: Adam Fritzler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 3:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JDEV] Jabber DevZone News - IM Unified Isn't the IMUnified pro

Re: [JDEV] Jabber DevZone News - IM Unified

2001-06-05 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Keith already pulled it from CVS for precisely this reason: http://jabber.org/?oid=1600 Peter Adam Fritzler wrote: > Isn't the IMUnified protocol under NDA? > > I assume if you're just looking and dumps and figuring it out, you > probably don't care. But if you were given documentation, yo

Re: [JDEV] Jabber DevZone News - IM Unified

2001-06-05 Thread Adam Fritzler
Isn't the IMUnified protocol under NDA? I assume if you're just looking and dumps and figuring it out, you probably don't care. But if you were given documentation, you might have a problem... af. On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Jabber DevZone wrote: > IM Unified _