Re: [jdev] MUC Across Unreliable S2S

2006-10-26 Thread Norman Rasmussen
A good place to hash out ideas is also http://wiki.jabber.org/index.php/Talk:NGMUC My comment on mirroring mucs: I've been thinking about this one recently. You could create a 'muclinker' component that sends presence to all rooms you want to 'mirror'. That will make all the rooms send you the

Re: [jdev] MUC Across Unreliable S2S

2006-10-25 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
I've been planning to write up an approach to this soon (probably next week), based on discussions I've had with people in the same situation. But more discussion is better! :-) Peter Don McGregor wrote: I've got an unusual deployment environment that may require some custom server code, and

RE: [jdev] MUC Across Unreliable S2S

2006-10-25 Thread JD Conley
It seems like this calls for an IRC style network approach where MUC domains can join a specific network and share room names. -JD I've been planning to write up an approach to this soon (probably next week), based on discussions I've had with people in the same situation. But more

Re: [jdev] MUC Across Unreliable S2S

2006-10-25 Thread Don McGregor
IRC, as I understand it, generates a spanning tree of the servers involved, and from what I read in the RFCs people are complaining about that. Something NNTP-ish might work, with each site giving a unique ID to each message and advertising what messages they have. There are also some room

RE: [jdev] MUC Across Unreliable S2S

2006-10-25 Thread JD Conley
Possibly. In any case we should move this conversation to Standards-JIG. -JD -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don McGregor Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 5:17 PM To: Jabber software development list Subject: Re: [jdev] MUC Across