For mail notification, you might try message type='headline'/ to
avoid offline storage.
On Apr 20, 2007, at 5:52 PM, Bruce Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Robin Redeker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:22:33PM +, Nathan Fritz wrote:
I don't see this as being the client's job.
How should my Jabber _client_ get the latest news about the remote
JID?
Ghosted users is an interesting (and common) issue that we've been
discussing a lot in the Standards list recently. Ideally the server
handles this for you. But, as you mention, remote servers going offline
aren't always
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 04:38:02AM +1000, Bruce Campbell wrote:
This more of a 'what are people doing now' question, not a 'what should
the implementations be doing'.
Lets say that my Jabber client has an avid desire to know the accurate
online status of remote JIDs, and the roster
I don't see this as being the client's job. Perhaps the protocol could be
changed to either make more assumptions such as if the s2s connection is
closed unexpectedly, then the server SHOULD consider all jids connected to
it as offline and perhaps even the suggestion of If an available jid has
Nathan Fritz wrote:
I don't see this as being the client's job. Perhaps the protocol could
be changed to either make more assumptions such as if the s2s
connection is closed unexpectedly, then the server SHOULD consider all
jids connected to it as offline and perhaps even the suggestion of If
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:22:33PM +, Nathan Fritz wrote:
I don't see this as being the client's job.
I completly agree! My view was about how the client could fix that
problem. And rather than the workarounds, a real solution would be
more desireable than quirkshacks. And a server side
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:22:33PM +, Nathan Fritz wrote:
I don't see this as being the client's job.
I completly agree! My view was about how the client could fix that
problem. And rather than the workarounds, a real solution would be
more desireable than quirkshacks. And a server
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Robin Redeker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:22:33PM +, Nathan Fritz wrote:
I don't see this as being the client's job.
[.snip.]
I don't believe that the client should take it upon itself to nag
about presence, as presence is high traffic enough as it is.
I
