Removing disc...@openjdk.java.net from the distribution list.
On 3/13/2013 8:25 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Our experience at Google has been that javac7 is a stricter compiler
than javac6. It is a significant effort migrating from javac6 to
javac7 with a large code base. Since openjdk6 is all
Our experience at Google has been that javac7 is a stricter compiler than
javac6. It is a significant effort migrating from javac6 to javac7 with a
large code base. Since openjdk6 is all about stability, I would resist
updating the javac in openjdk6. Some of the "bugs" in javac6 allow user
code
- Original Message -
> Responding to one point below,
>
> On 3/13/2013 12:47 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > - Original Message -
>
> [snip]
>
> > 4. Finally, this is just a thought, and I realise it may run
> > contrary
> > to your promise of long-term stability and compatibility,
- Original Message -
> Hello,
>
> On 03/13/2013 09:02 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Oracle ended public updates of JDK6 at the end of last month. Many
> > people seem to have concluded that the OpenJDK6 project will
> > therefore
> > end at the same time. This is incorrect: OpenJDK6 will
Hello,
On 03/13/2013 09:02 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
Oracle ended public updates of JDK6 at the end of last month. Many
people seem to have concluded that the OpenJDK6 project will therefore
end at the same time. This is incorrect: OpenJDK6 will continue, but
will be maintained by the community
Responding to one point below,
On 3/13/2013 12:47 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
[snip]
4. Finally, this is just a thought, and I realise it may run contrary
to your promise of long-term stability and compatibility, but I've
been giving some thought to the long runnin
On 03/13/2013 12:47 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
4. Finally, this is just a thought, and I realise it may run contrary to your
promise of long-term stability and compatibility, but I've been giving some
thought
to the long running issues we've had with javac in OpenJDK 6. For those who are
unaware
- Original Message -
> Oracle ended public updates of JDK6 at the end of last month. Many
> people seem to have concluded that the OpenJDK6 project will
> therefore
> end at the same time. This is incorrect: OpenJDK6 will continue, but
> will be maintained by the community outside Oracle.
Oracle ended public updates of JDK6 at the end of last month. Many
people seem to have concluded that the OpenJDK6 project will therefore
end at the same time. This is incorrect: OpenJDK6 will continue, but
will be maintained by the community outside Oracle.
This will require some infrastructure
