- Original Message -
> On 03/15/2013 04:51 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 15/03/2013 1:46 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >>> You don't seem to have an OpenJDK account. I can commit this on
> >>> your behalf, but I see no reason why you wouldn't be classed
>
On 03/15/2013 04:51 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
On 15/03/2013 1:46 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
You don't seem to have an OpenJDK account. I can commit this on
your behalf, but I see no reason why you wouldn't be classed
as a contributor (http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#co
- Original Message -
> On 15/03/2013 1:46 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > You don't seem to have an OpenJDK account. I can commit this on
> > your behalf, but I see no reason why you wouldn't be classed
> > as a contributor (http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#contributor) and
> > given at least a
On 15/03/2013 1:46 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
You don't seem to have an OpenJDK account. I can commit this on
your behalf, but I see no reason why you wouldn't be classed
as a contributor (http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#contributor) and
given at least author status on this project.
I suggest cont
- Original Message -
> Hi!
>
> I would like to backport this fix
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~brutisso/7197906/webrev.02/ for bug
> 7197906 to jdk6.
> I applied with small offset, was build, and is working fine.
>
> The webrev of applied patch can be found here:
> http://jvanek.fedorapeo
Hi!
I would like to backport this fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~brutisso/7197906/webrev.02/ for bug 7197906 to jdk6.
I applied with small offset, was build, and is working fine.
The webrev of applied patch can be found here:
http://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/oracle/jdk6/hs/
J.
