Re: [7u4] Request for approval for CR 7046929 - tools/javac/api/T6397104.java fails

Approved. On Jan 10, 2012, at 9:47 PM, Dmeetry Degrave wrote: > Hi, > > This is a request for jdk7 update 4. The changes in 7u4 are identical to jdk8. > > cr: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7046929 > fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/a07eef109532 > > thanks, > dmee

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk: 7047200: keytool safe store

Changeset: f56205750512 Author:weijun Date: 2011-09-09 11:18 +0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/f56205750512 7047200: keytool safe store Reviewed-by: xuelei ! src/share/classes/sun/security/tools/KeyTool.java + test/sun/security/tools/keytool/trystore.sh

Re: [7u4] Request for approval for CR 7047200: keytool safe store

Approved. On Jan 11, 2012, at 1:47 AM, Weijun Wang wrote: > Hi All > > This is a request to backport a jdk8 fix into jdk7u4. > > 7047200: keytool safe store > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7047200 > > Description: > > Some illegal keytool commands might corrupt a keys

[7u4] Request for approval for CR 7047200: keytool safe store

Hi All This is a request to backport a jdk8 fix into jdk7u4. 7047200: keytool safe store http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7047200 Description: Some illegal keytool commands might corrupt a keystore, we should avoid this. The fix is already included in jdk8 as: ht

[7u4] Request for approval for CR 7046929 - tools/javac/api/T6397104.java fails

Hi, This is a request for jdk7 update 4. The changes in 7u4 are identical to jdk8. cr: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7046929 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/a07eef109532 thanks, dmeetry

Re: Filing bugs

Great news. Thanks much for your help Nelson. Cheers, Mike Swingler Apple Inc. On Jan 9, 2012, at 11:40 PM, nelson.dco...@oracle.com wrote: > Mike, > > I have deployed the changes to accept reports through bugreport.sun.com for > bugs reported against the Mac OS X platform. These reports are f

Re: Filing bugs

On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:50 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: > On 09/01/2012 23:35, Roger Lewis wrote: >> >> >> It would be useful bugs being being submitted to bugs.sun.com related to >> this project team to have a term at the beginning of the synopsis that would >> help identify it as a bug related to

Re: [7u4] Request for approval for CR 7095980: Ensure HttpURLConnection (and supporting APIs) don't expose HttpOnly cookies

Approved. On Jan 10, 2012, at 6:43 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi, > > This is a request to backport a JDK 8 fix into JDK 7u4: > > 7095980: Ensure HttpURLConnection (and supporting APIs) don't expose HttpOnly > cookies > > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7095980 > > The fix

Re: JDK 7u2 is now GA

On 12/13/11 9:56 PM, Edvard Wendelin wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to announce that JDK 7u2 is now generally available [1]. We would > like to thank all of you for the contributions you've made! The final build > number of OpenJDK 7u2 is b13. OpenJDK source code is available on the > Mercurial serv

[7u4] Request for approval for CR 7095980: Ensure HttpURLConnection (and supporting APIs) don't expose HttpOnly cookies

Hi, This is a request to backport a JDK 8 fix into JDK 7u4: 7095980: Ensure HttpURLConnection (and supporting APIs) don't expose HttpOnly cookies http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7095980 The fix has already been pushed to JDK 8: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/33

Re: [7u4] Request for approval for 7115357 - closed/javax/swing/JTable/6263446/bug6263446Table.java fails on MacOS

Approved. On Jan 10, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request to backport a JDK 8 fix into JDK 7u4: > > 7115357 closed/javax/swing/JTable/6263446/bug6263446Table.java fails on MacOS > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7115357 > > The fix has

Re: [7u4] Request for approval for 6505523 - NullPointerException in BasicTreeUI when a node is removed by expansion listener

approved. On Jan 10, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request to backport a JDK 8 fix into JDK 7u4: > > 6505523 NullPointerException in BasicTreeUI when a node is removed by > expansion listener > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6505523 >

Re: [7u4] Request for approval for 7110815 - closed/javax/swing/JSplitPane/4885629/bug4885629.java unstable on MacOS

Approved. On Jan 10, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request to backport a JDK 8 fix into JDK 7u4: > > 7110815 closed/javax/swing/JSplitPane/4885629/bug4885629.java unstable on > MacOS > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7110815 > > The fi

[7u4] Request for approval for 7115357 - closed/javax/swing/JTable/6263446/bug6263446Table.java fails on MacOS

Hello, This is a request to backport a JDK 8 fix into JDK 7u4: 7115357 closed/javax/swing/JTable/6263446/bug6263446Table.java fails on MacOS http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7115357 The fix has already been pushed to JDK 8, as: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/7dd

[7u4] Request for approval for 6505523 - NullPointerException in BasicTreeUI when a node is removed by expansion listener

Hello, This is a request to backport a JDK 8 fix into JDK 7u4: 6505523 NullPointerException in BasicTreeUI when a node is removed by expansion listener http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6505523 The fix has already been pushed to JDK 8, as: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/

[7u4] Request for approval for 7110815 - closed/javax/swing/JSplitPane/4885629/bug4885629.java unstable on MacOS

Hello, This is a request to backport a JDK 8 fix into JDK 7u4: 7110815 closed/javax/swing/JSplitPane/4885629/bug4885629.java unstable on MacOS http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7110815 The fix has already been pushed to JDK 8, as: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/e

Re: Filing bugs

On 09/01/2012 23:35, Roger Lewis wrote: It would be useful bugs being being submitted to bugs.sun.com related to this project team to have a term at the beginning of the synopsis that would help identify it as a bug related to the project. This would be similar to how a keyword functions for

Re: Filing bugs

For Deploy we are already internally using the convention of putting '(Mac) ' at the start of the bug title, but only because it makes it easier for them to get routed directly to me. :-\ If we could use that, even just for the short term, it would be helpful for me, too. -- Scott K.

Re: Filing bugs