[7u4] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs23-b13

2012-02-03 Thread Alejandro E Murillo
Requesting approval to integrate hs23-b13 into jdk7u4-b11. A webrev is available at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/7u4/hs23-b13-jdk7u4-b11.webrev/ Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. The fixes in the

Re: Mac OS X port - update

2012-02-03 Thread Mike Swingler
Xcode has never installed Java, so you will still need some form of Java to get the build going, but that doesn't mean it can't be OpenJDK itself. There is still the issue that the only place to get the "current" JavaRuntimeSupport.framework headers is from the Apple Java package, however now t

Re: Mac OS X port - update

2012-02-03 Thread Jim Holmlund
On 2/3/2012 7:40 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: On 2/3/2012 7:36 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 03/02/2012 15:28, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: On 2/3/2012 3:23 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 03/02/2012 02:10, David Holmes wrote: I am concerned. There was some discussion when various changes went into 7u-o

Re: Mac OS X port - update

2012-02-03 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
On 2/3/2012 7:36 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 03/02/2012 15:28, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: On 2/3/2012 3:23 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 03/02/2012 02:10, David Holmes wrote: I am concerned. There was some discussion when various changes went into 7u-osx regarding the suitability of the changes for

Re: Mac OS X port - update

2012-02-03 Thread Alan Bateman
On 03/02/2012 15:28, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: On 2/3/2012 3:23 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 03/02/2012 02:10, David Holmes wrote: I am concerned. There was some discussion when various changes went into 7u-osx regarding the suitability of the changes for inclusion in the mainline repositories i

Re: Mac OS X port - update

2012-02-03 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
On 2/3/2012 3:23 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 03/02/2012 02:10, David Holmes wrote: I am concerned. There was some discussion when various changes went into 7u-osx regarding the suitability of the changes for inclusion in the mainline repositories ie 7u-dev. It was my understanding that there

Re: [jdk7u-dev] Request for approval for 7132204: Default testset in JPRT should not run all tests

2012-02-03 Thread Edvard Wendelin
Approved! :) Cheers, Edvard On Feb 3, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: > > This is a request to back-port a patch from jdk8 that changes the JPRT > configuration to dial-down the number of test targets that are run by default > and to add a new "core" testset. > > CR: http://bugs.sun.c

Re: Mac OS X port - update

2012-02-03 Thread Alan Bateman
On 03/02/2012 02:10, David Holmes wrote: I am concerned. There was some discussion when various changes went into 7u-osx regarding the suitability of the changes for inclusion in the mainline repositories ie 7u-dev. It was my understanding that there would be a more extensive review and, if n

[jdk7u-dev] Request for approval for 7132204: Default testset in JPRT should not run all tests

2012-02-03 Thread Alan Bateman
This is a request to back-port a patch from jdk8 that changes the JPRT configuration to dial-down the number of test targets that are run by default and to add a new "core" testset. CR: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7132204 The JDK8 change is here: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/t

Re: [jdk7u-dev] Request for approval for 7092627: use agentvm mode instead of samevm in regtests

2012-02-03 Thread Michael McMahon
On 03/02/12 10:59, Michael McMahon wrote: On 03/02/12 10:32, Alan Bateman wrote: This is a request to switch the jtreg execution mode from samevm to agentvm when running the jdk tests via the make files. CR: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7092627 This has been in jdk8 for some time,

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk: 7141739: [osx] Local attach fails if java.io.tmpdir is set

2012-02-03 Thread staffan . larsen
Changeset: ab842d66b05a Author:sla Date: 2012-02-03 11:58 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/ab842d66b05a 7141739: [osx] Local attach fails if java.io.tmpdir is set Summary: Make sure Hotspot and jdk looks for well-known files in the same locations Review

Re: [jdk7u-dev] Request for approval for 7092627: use agentvm mode instead of samevm in regtests

2012-02-03 Thread Michael McMahon
On 03/02/12 10:32, Alan Bateman wrote: This is a request to switch the jtreg execution mode from samevm to agentvm when running the jdk tests via the make files. CR: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7092627 This has been in jdk8 for some time, thanks to Max: http://hg.openjdk.java.net

Re: [jdk7u-dev] Request for approval for 7092627: use agentvm mode instead of samevm in regtests

2012-02-03 Thread Edvard Wendelin
Looks good to me! Approved. Cheers, Edvard On Feb 3, 2012, at 11:32 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: > > This is a request to switch the jtreg execution mode from samevm to agentvm > when running the jdk tests via the make files. > > CR: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7092627 > > This has bee

[jdk7u-dev] Request for approval for 7092627: use agentvm mode instead of samevm in regtests

2012-02-03 Thread Alan Bateman
This is a request to switch the jtreg execution mode from samevm to agentvm when running the jdk tests via the make files. CR: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7092627 This has been in jdk8 for some time, thanks to Max: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/daf87c7be6a1 The cha

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u/jdk: Added tag jdk7u4-b10 for changeset 6485e842d7f7

2012-02-03 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: 697ebf79bcd5 Author:katleman Date: 2012-02-03 01:40 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/jdk/rev/697ebf79bcd5 Added tag jdk7u4-b10 for changeset 6485e842d7f7 ! .hgtags

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u/jaxws: Added tag jdk7u4-b10 for changeset 3891fe529057

2012-02-03 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: 7e8bf009ba75 Author:katleman Date: 2012-02-03 01:39 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/jaxws/rev/7e8bf009ba75 Added tag jdk7u4-b10 for changeset 3891fe529057 ! .hgtags

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u/jaxp: Added tag jdk7u4-b10 for changeset 7a37651d304d

2012-02-03 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: dd670ae71aab Author:katleman Date: 2012-02-03 01:39 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/jaxp/rev/dd670ae71aab Added tag jdk7u4-b10 for changeset 7a37651d304d ! .hgtags

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u/hotspot: Added tag jdk7u4-b10 for changeset 305636960fa4

2012-02-03 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: 6b53e4c71c8a Author:katleman Date: 2012-02-03 01:39 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/hotspot/rev/6b53e4c71c8a Added tag jdk7u4-b10 for changeset 305636960fa4 ! .hgtags

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u: Added tag jdk7u4-b10 for changeset 2b07c262a8a9

2012-02-03 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: 48ffcdfeca95 Author:katleman Date: 2012-02-03 01:38 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/rev/48ffcdfeca95 Added tag jdk7u4-b10 for changeset 2b07c262a8a9 ! .hgtags

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u/corba: Added tag jdk7u4-b10 for changeset 23777178e7eb

2012-02-03 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: 6901a628c4df Author:katleman Date: 2012-02-03 01:38 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/corba/rev/6901a628c4df Added tag jdk7u4-b10 for changeset 23777178e7eb ! .hgtags

Re: Mac OS X port - update

2012-02-03 Thread Weijun Wang
Sorry, I just found out that the new Xcode has no JDK at all, so an Apple JDK is still needed. I guess it just does not matter which one should be installed first now. -Max On 02/03/2012 05:06 PM, Weijun Wang wrote: A question: The wiki does not mention install Apple JDK after Xcode for 10.7

Re: Mac OS X port - update

2012-02-03 Thread Weijun Wang
A question: The wiki does not mention install Apple JDK after Xcode for 10.7.3. Does this mean the step is not necessary anymore. So the yellow background text can be removed now? Thanks Max On 02/03/2012 04:32 PM, Henri Gomez wrote: Very good news, I'll add a new build process on http://h

Re: Mac OS X port - update

2012-02-03 Thread Henri Gomez
Very good news, I'll add a new build process on http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/ for openjdk-osx-build project. Stay tuned 2012/2/3 Kirk Pepperdine : > +1 > > Regards, > Kirk > > On 2012-02-03, at 1:24 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote: > >> This is very cool news.  As an observer watching the