Re: Dropping 32-bit support (was Branches)

2012-02-27 Thread Henri Gomez
> It is also perfectly plausible to build 32/64 Universal, and then use "lipo" > on built Mach-o products to strip out the architecture you don't > need/want/support in a post-build step. +1 > I think it's also a good idea to brainstorm/document some ways to strip down > a JRE for developers w

Re: Dropping 32-bit support (was Branches)

2012-02-27 Thread Mike Swingler
It is also perfectly plausible to build 32/64 Universal, and then use "lipo" on built Mach-o products to strip out the architecture you don't need/want/support in a post-build step. I think it's also a good idea to brainstorm/document some ways to strip down a JRE for developers who are bundlin

Re: Dropping 32-bit support (was Branches)

2012-02-27 Thread Paul Hohensee
Imo, it's very unlikely that 64-bit build footprint will ever be an issue, and 32-bit build footprint would be an issue on memory-limited devices, of which there are none that run OSX. The real utility of 32-bit is compatibility. I'd just go with universal binaries and not bother with 32/64 o

Re: Dropping 32-bit support (was Branches)

2012-02-27 Thread John Yeary
Personally I like the idea of a default with "Universal" binaries, and the options for 32/64 for the reasons you mentioned. I think it is important to be inclusive vs. exclusive. John Sent from my iPhone On Feb 27, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Artem Ananiev wrote: > > Alternatively, we can completely

Re: Dropping 32-bit support (was Branches)

2012-02-27 Thread Artem Ananiev
Alternatively, we can completely ignore ARCH_DATA_MODEL on Mac and always build universal binaries. As far as I remember, we did exactly this when Mac OS X Port was a standalone OpenJDK project. Of course, in this case we'll lose an ability to build 32-bit and 64-bit only builds, which may be

Re: [7u4] Review request for 7147435: closed/java/awt/Toolkit/Headless/WrappedToolkitTest/WrappedToolkitTest.sh failed since 7u4b11

2012-02-27 Thread Artem Ananiev
Hi, Anthony, I have an impression your webrev is prepared against an outdated version of code. For example, the change in java_props_md.c:431 is already in the workspace... Other comments: 1. HeadlessGraphicsEnvironment is in the sun.java2d package, not sun.awt 2. Changes to awt_LoadLibrary

Re: RFR (XXS): 7130404: [macosx] "os.arch" value should be "x86_64" for compatibility with Apple JDK6

2012-02-27 Thread Paul Hohensee
Changed jdk7-dev to jdk7u-dev. Paul On 2/27/12 4:51 PM, Paul Hohensee wrote: Looks good. Ship it. Paul On 2/26/12 10:57 PM, James Melvin wrote: Hi Stephen, The scope of the work for 7130404 is to... 1) Convert os.arch callsites to use 'x86_64' instead of 'amd64' 2) Add *missing* os.name c

Re: OS X preview only installs on Lion?

2012-02-27 Thread Stephen Bannasch
At 8:23 PM +0100 2/27/12, Henri Gomez wrote: >X11 is installed : > >otool -L /usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.6.dylib >/usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.6.dylib: >/usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.6.dylib (compatibility version >14.0.0, current version 14.2.0) >/usr/lib/libz.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.

Re: OS X preview only installs on Lion?

2012-02-27 Thread Henri Gomez
DK_FILE = >>  PREVIOUS_JRE_FILE = >>    ALT_PREVIOUS_JRE_FILE = >>  PREVIOUS_RELEASE_IMAGE = >>/System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home >>    ALT_PREVIOUS_RELEASE_IMAGE = >> >> >>WARNING: The BUILD_NUMBER needs to contain b[0-9][0-9]*. Current

Re: OpenJDK 7u4 End game

2012-02-27 Thread Edvard Wendelin
Hi, Last Thursday we published the latest early access build of the Oracle JDK 7u4 [1]. As I've mentioned in my past updates [2], the teams are now focusing on fixing bugs found by the community, QA or by the development teams. I'd like to welcome you to test the latest Oracle JDK, or your own

Request for phase 2 approval for CR 7124262 - [macosx] Drag events go to a wrong child.

2012-02-27 Thread Alexander Zuev
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7124262 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kizune/7124262/webrev.02/ Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/macosx-port-dev/2012-February/003293.html Reviewers: Alexander Potochkin (alexp), Sergey Bylokhov (serb) Rationale for inclusio

[7u4] Review request for 7147435: closed/java/awt/Toolkit/Headless/WrappedToolkitTest/WrappedToolkitTest.sh failed since 7u4b11

2012-02-27 Thread Anthony Petrov
Hello, Please review a fix for http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7147435 at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anthony/7u4-2-headlessTestFailed-7147435.0/ This bug is a regression of 7124511 fixed for the JDK Mac Port [1]. With that fix the code setting the awt.toolkit and java.aw

[7u4] Request for approval: 7132793: [macosx] setWheelScrollEnabled action reversed

2012-02-27 Thread Alexander Potochkin
Requesting approval to commit fix for CR 7132793. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexp/7132793/webrev.01/ Reviewed by Sergey Bylokhov and Artem Ananiev http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/macosx-port-dev/2012-February/003295.html the bug's description is here: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/v

Re: OS X preview only installs on Lion?

2012-02-27 Thread Stephen Bannasch
EVIOUS_JDK_VERSION = 1.6.0 >ALT_PREVIOUS_JDK_VERSION = > PREVIOUS_JDK_FILE = >ALT_PREVIOUS_JDK_FILE = > PREVIOUS_JRE_FILE = >ALT_PREVIOUS_JRE_FILE = > PREVIOUS_RELEASE_IMAGE = >/System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home >ALT_PREVIOUS_REL

Re: OS X preview only installs on Lion?

2012-02-27 Thread Henri Gomez
PREVIOUS_JRE_FILE = ALT_PREVIOUS_JRE_FILE = PREVIOUS_RELEASE_IMAGE = /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home ALT_PREVIOUS_RELEASE_IMAGE = WARNING: The BUILD_NUMBER needs to contain b[0-9][0-9]*. Currently BUILD_NUMBER=20120227. This has been known to cause build failures.