Hi all,
I'd like to request for approval to push the following change into 7u11.
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6512101
Changeset in jdk8
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/883feced1cdd
Reviewed by chegar, dsamersoff
Webrev for 7u
http://cr.openjdk.java.net
Phil,
Yes - people "should" cc relevant parties when such backports are taking
place. Not mandatory though. Rule 5 in code review guidelines :
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/codereview.html
It's probably a good time to remind OpenJDK 7u contributors to carry out
such checks where appl
I believe the process on requesting a backport is that the 8 code approvers
need to be CC'd and that the 7 release managers should be enforcing this.
In this email there's basically no justification of the need for a backport
and I heartily disapprove of backporting 8004316. Its not that importa
Hi Jayashree,
Committed, please verify:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/d6c538499353
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:43 PM, jayashree viswanathan <
jvisw...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would like to get approval for back-porting the fix for 8004316, on JDK 7
> . The patch
Changeset: d6c538499353
Author:jviswana
Date: 2012-12-12 13:28 +0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/d6c538499353
8004316: Printer - tempfile having incorrect extension
Reviewed-by: bae, jgodinez
! src/solaris/classes/sun/print/UnixPrintJob.java
Hi Shi Jun,
Committed. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/11093adbb875
Please verify.
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Edvard Wendelin
wrote:
> Approved.
>
> On 01/07/2013 08:45 AM, Shi Jun wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to request for approval to push the following change
Changeset: 11093adbb875
Author:zhangshj
Date: 2012-11-30 17:24 +0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/11093adbb875
8004211: Remove unused dlinfo local variable in launcher code
Reviewed-by: alanb
! src/solaris/bin/java_md_solinux.c
