Change pushed. We now have 134 RMI tests passing in jdk7u, with only 4 excluded
-- same as jdk8!
Regarding the mailing list, we should probably replace jdk-regt...@sun.com with
an OpenJDK mailing list. The problem is, which one? Core-libs-dev, jdk8-dev,
jdk7u-dev, discuss, and quality-discuss
Changeset: a724ea5862a7
Author:smarks
Date: 2013-02-12 14:41 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/a724ea5862a7
8007515: TEST_BUG: update ProblemList.txt and TEST.ROOT in jdk7u-dev to match
jdk8
Reviewed-by: alanb, mchung, dmocek
! test/ProblemList.txt
! te
Mandy,
On 2013-02-13 02:25, Mandy Chung wrote:
> You didn't include jdk_management test target in your jprt job and your
> test was not run at all. jdk_management is not included in the default
> due to its test reliability issue.
Thank you for letting me know!
> Sounds like you didn't run the
Dmitry,
you have to use "-testset core" to run this test via JPRT. It's not run
on regular jobs.
Alejandro
On 2/12/2013 3:18 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Kelly,
Do you have an idea why I didn't see this failure under jprt?
http://sthjprt.se.oracle.com/archives/2013/02/2013-02-08-192233.dsa
You didn't include jdk_management test target in your jprt job and your
test was not run at all. jdk_management is not included in the default
due to its test reliability issue. Sounds like you didn't run the new
shell tests via jtreg on your local machine to make sure it passes
before you sub
Chris,
I'm not able to reproduce it locally. Do you have a link to jprt job you
see this failure?
-Dmitry
On 2013-02-12 21:38, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> Dmitry,
>
> This test is now failing on several platforms, on jdk8 and 7u-dev
>
> ---
>
> result: Passed. Compilation successful
>
> #sect
Kelly,
Do you have an idea why I didn't see this failure under jprt?
http://sthjprt.se.oracle.com/archives/2013/02/2013-02-08-192233.dsamerso.tl/
-Dmitry
On 2013-02-12 21:52, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> +if [ ! -f ${_testclasses} ]
> needs to be
> +if [ ! -d ${_testclasses} ]
>
>
> -kto
>
Kelly,
Good catch but this part of test is not executed under JTReg, and this
mistake cause extra mkdir call but not a test error.
-Dmitry
On 2013-02-12 21:52, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> +if [ ! -f ${_testclasses} ]
> needs to be
> +if [ ! -d ${_testclasses} ]
>
>
> -kto
>
> On Feb 12, 201
Seems to me we need an Oracle equivalent. Is there already one for
jtreg or JDK tests in general? Not a huge priority, but we should get
rid of the sun.com email addresses when an easy opportunity arises.
Darryl
On 02/11/2013 06:06 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
Arrgh, ya caught me! :-) I was aware
On 2/11/13 3:02 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smarks/reviews/8007515/webrev.1/
Looks okay to me.
Mandy
+if [ ! -f ${_testclasses} ]
needs to be
+if [ ! -d ${_testclasses} ]
-kto
On Feb 12, 2013, at 9:38 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> Dmitry,
>
> This test is now failing on several platforms, on jdk8 and 7u-dev
>
> ---
>
> result: Passed. Compilation successful
>
> #section:shell
> --
Dmitry,
This test is now failing on several platforms, on jdk8 and 7u-dev
---
result: Passed. Compilation successful
#section:shell
--messages:(3/154)--
command: shell JdpTest.sh [--jtreg, --no-compile]
reason: User specified action: run shell JdpTest.sh --jtreg --no-compil
Changeset: cce9ada9668b
Author:weijun
Date: 2013-02-08 08:56 +0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/cce9ada9668b
8007761: NTLM coding errors
Reviewed-by: chegar
! src/share/classes/com/sun/security/ntlm/Client.java
! src/share/classes/com/sun/security/ntlm/NT
Changeset: d0d5986f25ef
Author:chegar
Date: 2011-08-09 16:59 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/d0d5986f25ef
7076756: TEST_BUG: com/sun/jdi/BreakpointWithFullGC.sh fails to cleanup in
Cygwin
Reviewed-by: alanb, dcubed
! test/com/sun/jdi/ShellScaffold.sh
Changeset: 4697f4725cee
Author:dsamersoff
Date: 2013-02-12 16:41 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/4697f4725cee
8007786: JDK-8002048 testcase doesn't work on Solaris
Summary: test built in into Solaris shell doesn't have -e operator
Reviewed-by: sla, sspi
Approved.
regards,
Sean.
On 12/02/2013 12:12, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Requesting approval to push the following change to jdk7u:
Summary
Built in test function of Solaris /bin/sh doesn't have -e operator and
doesn't allow a variable and a function with the same name.
webrev:
http://cr.openj
Thank you Sean.
-Chris.
On 02/12/2013 12:24 PM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Looks good Chris!
Approved for jdk7u-dev.
regards,
Sean.
On 12/02/2013 11:46, Chris Hegarty wrote:
This is a bulk request for approval to backport some test
stabilization change from JDK8 to 7u-dev. There are many more, this
Looks good Chris!
Approved for jdk7u-dev.
regards,
Sean.
On 12/02/2013 11:46, Chris Hegarty wrote:
This is a bulk request for approval to backport some test
stabilization change from JDK8 to 7u-dev. There are many more, this is
just a start!
All changes are in JDK8, and all changesets are i
Requesting approval to push the following change to jdk7u:
Summary
Built in test function of Solaris /bin/sh doesn't have -e operator and
doesn't allow a variable and a function with the same name.
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/8007786.JDP-TEST2/webrev.01/jdk/
bug:
http://bug
Changeset: 6707e6b768ee
Author:mcherkas
Date: 2013-02-12 16:11 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/6707e6b768ee
8005932: Java 7 on mac os x only provides text clipboard formats
Reviewed-by: alexp, denis
! src/macosx/lib/flavormap.properties
+
test/java/aw
This is a bulk request for approval to backport some test stabilization
change from JDK8 to 7u-dev. There are many more, this is just a start!
All changes are in JDK8, and all changesets are identical.
7076756: TEST_BUG: com/sun/jdi/BreakpointWithFullGC.sh fails to cleanup
in Cygwin
http://hg
Approved,
regards,
Sean.
On 12/02/2013 10:26, Chris Hegarty wrote:
This is a request for approval to backport a test stabilization change
from JDK8 to 7u-dev.
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7076756
JDK8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/cf203f293b4e
JDK8 review
Changeset: 10eae5966c2d
Author:chegar
Date: 2012-09-07 14:00 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/10eae5966c2d
7032247: java/net/InetAddress/GetLocalHostWithSM.java fails if hostname
resolves to loopback address
Summary: TESTBUG
Reviewed-by: chegar, alanb
C
This is a request for approval to backport a test stabilization change
from JDK8 to 7u-dev.
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7076756
JDK8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/cf203f293b4e
JDK8 review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/20
Nice work on the test stabilisation front Chris!
Approved,
regards,
Sean.
On 12/02/2013 10:13, Chris Hegarty wrote:
This is a request for approval to backport a test stabilization change
from JDK8 to 7u-dev.
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7073295
JDK8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.
Approved,
regards,
Sean.
On 12/02/2013 10:06, Chris Hegarty wrote:
This is a request for approval to backport a test stabilization change
from JDK8 to 7u-dev.
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7044870
JDK8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/c9e78769c0da
JDK8 review
Approved,
regards,
Sean.
On 12/02/2013 10:00, Chris Hegarty wrote:
This is a request for approval to backport a test stabilization change
from JDK8 to 7u-dev.
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6776144
JDK8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/7eb0debca9b3
JDK8 review
Approved,
regards,
Sean.
On 12/02/2013 09:54, Chris Hegarty wrote:
This is a request for approval to backport a test stabilization change
from JDK8 to 7u-dev.
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6963841
JDK8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/85b7fcf14249
JDK8 review
This is a request for approval to backport a test stabilization change
from JDK8 to 7u-dev.
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7073295
JDK8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/26fe74aa48ef
JDK8 review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/20
Approved,
regards,
Sean.
On 12/02/2013 09:51, Chris Hegarty wrote:
This is a request for approval to backport a test stabilization change
from JDK8 to 7u-dev.
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7032247
JDK8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/d5d24c08f0dc
JDK8 rev
This is a request for approval to backport a test stabilization change
from JDK8 to 7u-dev.
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7044870
JDK8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/c9e78769c0da
JDK8 review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nio-dev/2011-August/
Changeset: c9bc97a00f69
Author:dsamersoff
Date: 2013-02-12 14:03 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/c9bc97a00f69
8007536: Incorrect copyright header in JDP files
Summary: Copyright header in JDP files missed the "classpath exception" rule.
Reviewed-by: mik
This is a request for approval to backport a test stabilization change
from JDK8 to 7u-dev.
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6776144
JDK8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/7eb0debca9b3
JDK8 review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2011-No
This is a request for approval to backport a test stabilization change
from JDK8 to 7u-dev.
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6963841
JDK8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/85b7fcf14249
JDK8 review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-Ap
This is a request for approval to backport a test stabilization change
from JDK8 to 7u-dev.
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7032247
JDK8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/d5d24c08f0dc
JDK8 review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2012-Sept
Approved,
regards,
Sean.
On 11/02/2013 02:16, Weijun Wang wrote:
Hi All
This is a request to backport a jdk8 fix into jdk7u.
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8007761
Description.
The fix is already included in jdk8 as:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/57cb
Hi Martin,
It seems that adding a default method Comparator.reverseOrder() had an
impact on the code in Collections.
In he following code in Collections:
private static class ReverseComparator
implements Comparator>, Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionU
This is a simple change to remove is_kernel_jvm field in
jvm_version_info, as kernel VM has been deprecated.
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8006691
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8006691/jdk8/webrev.00/
It has been reviewed by mchung
Thanks,
-Zhengyu
Approved,
regards,
Sean.
On 11/02/2013 14:57, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Requesting approval to push the following change to jdk7u:
Summary
Copyright header in JDP files missed the "classpath exception" rule.
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/8007536.JDP-COPYRIGHT/webrev.01/jdk/
On 11/02/2013 23:02, Stuart Marks wrote:
I thought about dealing with TEST.ROOT in a separate bug but that just
seems like busy-work. Updating the problem list is at least as much
about making sure that the testing configurations between jdk8 and
jdk7u are brought closer together as much as i
40 matches
Mail list logo
