Changeset: 2f38ced3bea8
Author:dmeetry
Date: 2013-04-29 16:51 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/corba/rev/2f38ced3bea8
8011986: [corba] idlj generates read/write union helper methods that throw
wrong exception in some cases
Reviewed-by: lancea
! src/share/class
Changeset: 583e454e0813
Author:dmeetry
Date: 2013-04-29 16:44 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/corba/rev/583e454e0813
4504275: CORBA boolean type unions do not generate compilable code from idlj
Summary: JLS doesn't allow boolean type in switch statement, hence
Changeset: 05420e655463
Author:alanb
Date: 2013-04-17 16:11 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/05420e655463
8012019: (fc) Thread.interrupt triggers hang in FileChannelImpl.pread (win)
Reviewed-by: chegar
! src/share/classes/sun/nio/ch/DatagramChannelImpl.
Approved.
regards,
Sean.
On 29/04/13 15:58, Dmeetry Degrave wrote:
Requesting approval to push two Corba fixes to 7u-dev, identical to jdk8.
4504275: CORBA boolean type unions do not generate compilable code
from idlj
bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4504275
fix: http:
Mikhail,
This is a new method you're proposing to introduce in a public API for
an update release. Granted, it's an override.
cc'ing Joe Darcy here to confirm that it's OK and that it doesn't
introduce a source/binary compatibility concern. - Joe - can you comment
if this change is OK for 7u
Approved. Please add an appropriate "noreg-[]" label to the bug.
regards,
Sean.
On 29/04/13 14:15, Petr Pchelko wrote:
Hello
This is a request to backport the fix for JDK-7179050 from 8 to 7u-dev.
The bug:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7179050
The changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.ne
Requesting approval to push two Corba fixes to 7u-dev, identical to jdk8.
4504275: CORBA boolean type unions do not generate compilable code from idlj
bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4504275
fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/corba/rev/8f0a461776a9
8011986: [corba] i
Hello All,
Requesting approval to push a fix to 7u-dev, it absolutely the same as
for jdk8:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/2b8bd577257c
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8012004
Thanks,
Mikhail.
Hi, Petr.
Fix looks good.
On 29.04.2013 17:56, Petr Pchelko wrote:
Hello, AWT Team.
Please, review the back-port of the fix for JDK-8006634 to the JDK7u. I am
sending it as a separate review request because the code changes are different
in the patches.
The bug:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.
Hello, AWT Team.
Please, review the back-port of the fix for JDK-8006634 to the JDK7u. I am
sending it as a separate review request because the code changes are different
in the patches.
The bug:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8006634
The webrev for JDK7-u:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~p
Hello
This is a request to backport the fix for JDK-7179050 from 8 to 7u-dev.
The bug:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7179050
The changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/5309fed435b5
The review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2013-January/004095.html
11 matches
Mail list logo