Changeset: 282d82bfdde7
Author:leonidr
Date: 2013-06-26 05:57 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/jdk/rev/282d82bfdde7
8014821: Regression: Focus issues with Oracle WebCenter Capture applet
Reviewed-by: anthony, leonidr
Contributed-by: anton.tara...@oracle.com
!
On 6/18/13 12:49 AM, alexey zhebel wrote:
We are moving to a new process for generating man pages. I checked in the two
that changed for 7u40 (java and jcmd):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~azhebel/8016767/
Please review.
Note that the copyright/license information format was approved by Donald Sm
Changeset: ee18d5c46468
Author:mchung
Date: 2013-06-25 16:12 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/jdk/rev/ee18d5c46468
8016814: sun.reflect.Reflection.getCallerClass returns the frame off by 1
Reviewed-by: jrose, alanb, chegar, twisti
! src/share/classes/sun/refl
7u40-dev forest's issues have been fixed and it's now opened for
approved fixes.
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev
The new 7u40-dev b31 deadline is tomorrow - Wed, Jun 26, 10AM PT (sharp!).
Integration is also tomorrow (provided there won't be any issues).
Promotion was moved to Thu
Bug : http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8015334
Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8015334.jdk7.1
Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2013-June/003485.html
Reviewed by Steven Loomis, Andrew Brygin
Rationale : Nasty memory leak which quickly takes down the whole JRE.
R
Changeset: 55dc0f4c3579
Author:prr
Date: 2013-06-25 14:50 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/jdk/rev/55dc0f4c3579
8015334: Memory leak when kerning is used on Windows.
Reviewed-by: srl, bae
! src/share/native/sun/font/layout/KernTable.cpp
! src/share/native/sun
Sync request. Approved for jdk7u40-dev.
regards,
Sean.
On 25/06/2013 22:10, Abhijit Saha (Oracle) wrote:
Hello,
please approve the following sync fix from 7u25 CPU release into 7u40
b31. This fix was missed during last sync operation.
Bug: 8015998
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asaha/8
Approved for jdk7u40-dev.
regards,
Sean.
On 25/06/2013 11:29, Vincent Ryan wrote:
There is no specific test to verify the fix (it's labeled 'noreg-hard').
Our existing PKCS11 tests already exercise the code path that the new
NSS initializer now uses.
I've added a link to a recent JPRT test
Thanks for verifying. Approved for jdk7u40-dev.
regards,
Sean.
On 25/06/2013 11:29, Vincent Ryan wrote:
The testcase to verify the fix:
jdk/test/closed/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/OCSP/ValidateUsingOCSPCache.java
I've added a link to a recent JPRT test run to my justification comm
Approved for jdk7u40-dev.
regards,
Sean.
On 25/06/2013 10:05, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Hello,
please, approve the following fix backport for 7u40
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7199324
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/JDK-7199324/webrev.03/
Code Review:
http://mail.
Issue is now resolved.
b31 promotion has been pushed out by one day, so please push 7u40
approved fixes when possible.
regards,
Sean.
On 25/06/2013 12:01, Seán Coffey wrote:
There appears to be a mercurial configuration issue with the new
jdk7u40, jdk7u40-dev forests. Syncs between the gates
Hello,
please approve the following sync fix from 7u25 CPU release into 7u40
b31. This fix was missed during last sync operation.
Bug: 8015998
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asaha/8015998-7u40/webrev/
Thanks,
Abhijit
On 6/25/2013 1:52 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
in that case, I'd suggest that we go for the stricter interpretation, and
require two jdk7u reviewers.
BTW this could mean that the original 8 fix which is back ported may need
additional review.
Yes. Do you think that would be challenging in gener
On 6/21/13 6:44 PM, Phil Race wrote:
> Historically the SE client areas (swing/awt/2d) have required 2 reviewers
> for everything that's a significant change.
> test, doc, trivial fixes can have one reviewer.
Yeah, I can see in that case the maintainer approving the fix acting as the
additional,
Changeset: eca480919c71
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-05-22 15:44 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/corba/rev/eca480919c71
Added tag jdk7u25-b12 for changeset ef8e6f8305d5
! .hgtags
Changeset: 577c4dd1a6e9
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-05-24 16:20 -0700
UR
Changeset: 5ed8c4534800
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-05-22 15:45 -0700
URL:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/langtools/rev/5ed8c4534800
Added tag jdk7u25-b12 for changeset 28358b2489b2
! .hgtags
Changeset: c6342ec6a12f
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-05-24 16:20 -07
Changeset: 8295223a3d0b
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-06-14 18:10 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/jdk/rev/8295223a3d0b
Added tag jdk7u25-b32 for changeset 55f01444cf58
! .hgtags
Changeset: 7d92b04dc65a
Author:asaha
Date: 2013-06-21 10:54 -0700
URL:
Changeset: 83b80c094bef
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-05-22 15:44 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/jaxp/rev/83b80c094bef
Added tag jdk7u25-b12 for changeset 5e87aee78c91
! .hgtags
Changeset: 68cc0d2a49f0
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-05-24 16:20 -0700
URL
Changeset: 6b4a16522130
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-05-22 15:44 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/jaxws/rev/6b4a16522130
Added tag jdk7u25-b12 for changeset 4c5d242efa0d
! .hgtags
Changeset: 03073e4e6d3f
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-05-24 16:20 -0700
UR
Changeset: 37c4268341d7
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-05-22 15:44 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/rev/37c4268341d7
Added tag jdk7u25-b12 for changeset 2d0251896005
! .hgtags
Changeset: 9de1fc3635de
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-05-24 16:20 -0700
URL:
Apologies for noise. Didn't mean to cc jdk7u-dev OpenJDK mailing list on
this issue (since it concerns build logistics) -
I'll pay better attention next time!
regards,
Sean.
On 25/06/2013 17:08, Lana Steuck wrote:
> it looks like master forest is ok.
I see that hotspot has integrated into 7
> it looks like master forest is ok.
I see that hotspot has integrated into 7u40 Master (jdk7u/jdk7u40).
Just to double-check, are we sure that all the repos in Master
(jdk7u/jdk7u40) are fine (-gate and their read-only repos in sync)?
Thanks,
- Lana
On 06/25/2013 07:45 AM, Seán Coffey wrote
hs24-b50 has been integrated into jdk7u40-b31.
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40/rev/11147a12bd8c
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40/corba/rev/c5b5886004e6
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40/hotspot/rev/645b68762a36
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40/jaxp/rev/d9b92749a0f4
On 6/18/13 9:49 AM, alexey zhebel wrote:
> We are moving to a new process for generating man pages. I checked in the two
> that changed for 7u40 (java and jcmd):
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~azhebel/8016767/
>
> Please review.
>
I took a quick look at the pages as well with a focus outside the
Changeset: 9ba4f38e3000
Author:amurillo
Date: 2013-06-13 11:10 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/hotspot/rev/9ba4f38e3000
8016566: new hotspot build - hs24-b50
Reviewed-by: jcoomes
! make/hotspot_version
Changeset: f65b000853c7
Author:brutisso
Date:
The setup of 7u40 stabilization forest has been met with several issues :
* b30 delayed due to deploy request
* Installer sync changes broke b31 (weds night)
* Hudson crashed on re-attempting to build31 (thurs night)
and now we've got mercurial configuration issues which have blocked 7u40
fix p
Changeset: 9ba4f38e3000
Author:amurillo
Date: 2013-06-13 11:10 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40/hotspot/rev/9ba4f38e3000
8016566: new hotspot build - hs24-b50
Reviewed-by: jcoomes
! make/hotspot_version
Changeset: f65b000853c7
Author:brutisso
Date: 2013
Alejandro,
Approved for jdk7u40. Please hold off on any pushes to 7u40 until we get
the all clear from ops around resolution of current 7u40 mercurial
configuration issues.
regards,
Sean.
On 22/06/2013 07:52, Alejandro E Murillo wrote:
Requesting approval to integrate hs24-b50 into jdk7u40-
There appears to be a mercurial configuration issue with the new
jdk7u40, jdk7u40-dev forests. Syncs between the gates and the original
repos are not happening. I suggest holding off any pushes for 7u-dev,
7u40-dev for the moment in case changes needs to be rolled back. See
attached.
Hopefull
The testcase to verify the fix:
jdk/test/closed/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/OCSP/ValidateUsingOCSPCache.java
I've added a link to a recent JPRT test run to my justification comment:
https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8014805?focusedCommentId=13343010&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi
There is no specific test to verify the fix (it's labeled 'noreg-hard').
Our existing PKCS11 tests already exercise the code path that the new NSS
initializer now uses.
I've added a link to a recent JPRT test run to my justification comment:
https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-7165807?focuse
Hello,
please, approve the following fix backport for 7u40
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7199324
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/JDK-7199324/webrev.03/
Code Review:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2012-December/00.html
http://mail.openjd
32 matches
Mail list logo
