[jdk7u-dev 7u60] Request for approval: (JAXP) 8016500 : Unlocalized warnings.

Hi, I'd like to request for approval to backport 8016500 to 7u60. This change has been verified by i18n team. Here's the bug: https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8016500 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jdk8/8016500/webrev/ Link to review thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pip

[jdk7u-dev 7u60] Request for approval: (JAXP) 8016500 : Unlocalized warnigs.

Hi, I'd like to request for approval to backport 8016500 to 7u60. This change has been verified by i18n team. Here's the bug: https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8016500 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jdk8/8016500/webrev/ Link to review thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pip

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk: 8015243: SchemaFactory does not catch enum. value that is not in the value space of the base type, anyURI

Changeset: e0e3b791ec9d Author:joehw Date: 2013-10-17 17:00 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/e0e3b791ec9d 8015243: SchemaFactory does not catch enum. value that is not in the value space of the base type, anyURI Reviewed-by: lancea + test/javax/xml/jax

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jaxp: 8015243: SchemaFactory does not catch enum. value that is not in the value space of the base type, anyURI

Changeset: e200ce7cc24b Author:joehw Date: 2013-10-17 16:59 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jaxp/rev/e200ce7cc24b 8015243: SchemaFactory does not catch enum. value that is not in the value space of the base type, anyURI Reviewed-by: lancea ! src/com/sun/org/a

Re: [jdk7u-dev 7u60] Request for approval: (JAXP) 8015243 : SchemaFactory does not catch enum. value that is not in the value space of the base type, anyURI.

Thanks Rob. I think that indeed meant a codereview approval :) -Joe On 10/17/2013 3:51 PM, Rob McKenna wrote: Approved, on the assumption that Lance's "+1" constituted a codereview approval :) -Rob On 17/10/13 20:08, huizhe wang wrote: Hi, I'd like to request for approval to backport

Re: [jdk7u-dev 7u60] Request for approval: (JAXP) 8015243 : SchemaFactory does not catch enum. value that is not in the value space of the base type, anyURI.

Approved, on the assumption that Lance's "+1" constituted a codereview approval :) -Rob On 17/10/13 20:08, huizhe wang wrote: Hi, I'd like to request for approval to backport 8015243 to 7u60. Here's the bug: https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8015243 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.n

[jdk7u-dev 7u60] Request for approval: (JAXP) 8015243 : SchemaFactory does not catch enum. value that is not in the value space of the base type, anyURI.

Hi, I'd like to request for approval to backport 8015243 to 7u60. Here's the bug: https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8015243 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jdk8/8015243/webrev/ Link to review thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-October/022203.html

Re: [7u communication] Plans for delivery of critical 7u fixes into CPU releases

- Original Message - > I think I can see Mario's point/confusion. > > The CPU-critical-request keyword is really just about what you'd like to > see in Oracle's > next binary product release and isn't needed for OpenJDK since the fix > is likely already > sitting in 7u-dev and just has to

Re: [7u communication] Plans for delivery of critical 7u fixes into CPU releases

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Mario Torre wrote: > 2013/10/17 Dalibor Topic : >> On 10/17/13 4:29 PM, Andrew wrote: >>> - Original Message - On 10/15/13 8:50 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > What is the benefit to "OpenJDK 7u Authors, Committers and Reviewers" of > using our valu

Re: [7u communication] Plans for delivery of critical 7u fixes into CPU releases

I think I can see Mario's point/confusion. The CPU-critical-request keyword is really just about what you'd like to see in Oracle's next binary product release and isn't needed for OpenJDK since the fix is likely already sitting in 7u-dev and just has to be pulled into the CPU binary release.

Re: [7u communication] Plans for delivery of critical 7u fixes into CPU releases

2013/10/17 Dalibor Topic : > On 10/17/13 4:29 PM, Andrew wrote: >> - Original Message - >>> On 10/15/13 8:50 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: What is the benefit to "OpenJDK 7u Authors, Committers and Reviewers" of using our valuable time to do this? >>> >>> "inclusion into a CPU rel

Re: [7u communication] Plans for delivery of critical 7u fixes into CPU releases

On 10/17/13 4:29 PM, Andrew wrote: > - Original Message - >> On 10/15/13 8:50 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: >>> What is the benefit to "OpenJDK 7u Authors, Committers and Reviewers" of >>> using our valuable time >>> to do this? >> >> "inclusion into a CPU release before 7u60" "for" "critical fi

Re: [7u communication] Plans for delivery of critical 7u fixes into CPU releases

- Original Message - > On 10/15/13 8:50 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > What is the benefit to "OpenJDK 7u Authors, Committers and Reviewers" of > > using our valuable time > > to do this? > > "inclusion into a CPU release before 7u60" "for" "critical fixes" "approved > by the Oracle JDK 7u C

Re: Request for approval for 8025255: (tz) Support tzdata2013g

Alan, Of course, I'll wait for few days. Also, I'll fix JDK-8026772 - the root cause is mine changes: All time zone names translations are based on internal translation file of globalization/translation team. I'll ask them to check this file for correctness one more time. Thanks, Aleksej On

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u-dev: 8025920: webrev.ksh does not provide any details about changes in zip files

Changeset: 104c02d9c423 Author:thurka Date: 2013-10-07 13:11 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/rev/104c02d9c423 8025920: webrev.ksh does not provide any details about changes in zip files Summary: Add support for diffs for zip files Reviewed-by: ksrini, chegar !

Re: JDK-8014394

On 10/16/13 8:24 AM, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Hi, > > Are there formal ways to do such requests, please ? No - but this mailing list should do for now. cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961

Re: Request for approval for 8025255: (tz) Support tzdata2013g

On 16/10/2013 22:12, Aleksej Efimov wrote: Hi, This is a backport of the following JDK 8 bug [1] to 7u-dev. Would it be possible to wait a day or two to see if any issues come from the change pushed to jdk8/tl? There is at least one new test failure in jdk8/tl (see JDK-8026772) that may be caus