Hi Andrew,
> at this, and then you can critique
> the result rather than what you think I'm saying.
That's good! Facts not theory!
> However, I don't see
> the sudden rush for this. We're not having another release until October.
I started working on this, and I just want to get this off my list
- Original Message -
> Hi Andrew :),
>
> sorry, I don't understand.
>
> > $ hg pull -r 9ee6abf28de9 ../../ppc7/hotspot
> This will give you most of the changes we did without openJdk bugid.
> Just the ones Andrew Ha. doesn't want at all as I understand.
> You will have to do some meanin
Hi Andrew :),
sorry, I don't understand.
> $ hg pull -r 9ee6abf28de9 ../../ppc7/hotspot
This will give you most of the changes we did without openJdk bugid.
Just the ones Andrew Ha. doesn't want at all as I understand.
You will have to do some meaningful merges, without being able
to build, as,
- Original Message -
> Hmm, I don't feel like taking the changes in ppc-aix-port/jdk7u apart,
> and re-assembling them in jdk7u/jdk7u.
> Bugs and porting efforts (like porting to LE) are mixed.
>
> I would either do a hg pull from ppc-aix-port/jdk7u to jdk7u/jdk7u
> or plain diff / patch /
Is there a way to mark the bugs fixed in Jira by hand?
Would that help?
Best regards,
Goetz
> -Original Message-
> From: jdk7u-dev [mailto:jdk7u-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf
> Of Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Sent: Freitag, 22. Juli 2016 11:11
> To: Andrew Haley ; Andrew Hughes
>
> C
Hmm, I don't feel like taking the changes in ppc-aix-port/jdk7u apart,
and re-assembling them in jdk7u/jdk7u.
Bugs and porting efforts (like porting to LE) are mixed.
I would either do a hg pull from ppc-aix-port/jdk7u to jdk7u/jdk7u
or plain diff / patch / hg commit.
Also, I can not pull subseq
On 22/07/16 09:35, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> Hmm, I would not consider the original port broken, it's what we used
> productive for several years before.
> Sure the code that exists now has some issues fixed (7 I think), but that's
> only
> the normal continuous bugfixing you have in any produ
> import a broken port with a ton of patches on top.
Hmm, I would not consider the original port broken, it's what we used
productive for several years before.
Sure the code that exists now has some issues fixed (7 I think), but that's
only
the normal continuous bugfixing you have in any product
