Re: [7u] RFR 8035166: Remove dependency on EC classes from pkcs11 provider

On 18:04 Tue 15 Dec , Andrew Brygin wrote: > Hello Sergey, > > thanks for the clarification, I see that JDK-8035166 is a prerequisite > for JDK-8233228. > > The 8u backport for JDK-8035166 has been pushed into jdk8u-dev, and has > fixVersion openjdk8u292 (April 2021). Most likely, 8u backp

Re: [7u] RFR: jdk7u281-b01

On 17:44 Wed 21 Oct , Andrew Brygin wrote: > Hello, > > here are proposed changes for jdk7u281. > > Webrevs: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bae/7u/7u281/ > > Security fixes: > JDK-8233624: Enhance JNI linkage > JDK-8236862: Enhance support of Proxy class > JDK-8237990: Enhanced LDAP contexts >

OpenJDK 7u271 Released

We are pleased to announce the release of OpenJDK 7u271. The source tarball is available from: * https://openjdk-sources.osci.io/openjdk7/openjdk7u271-ga.tar.xz The tarball is accompanied by a digital signature available at: * https://openjdk-sources.osci.io/openjdk7/openjdk7u271-ga.tar.xz.sig

[RFR] [7u] jdk7u271-b01

Here are the changes for the jdk7u repository for the July 2020 security update. As well as the security fixes from jdk8u262-b10, I also included a few relevant backports from earlier in the 8u262 cycle, along with a number of outstanding bundled library updates which have apparently been in the p

Result: New OpenJDK 7 Updates Reviewer: Martin Balao

Voting for Martin Balao [0] is now closed. Yes: 4 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 Invalid: 0 Turnout: 6% (4/66) According to the Bylaws definition of Three-Vote Consensus [1], this is sufficient to approve the nomination. [0] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2020-May/011025.html [1] http://

Re: CFV: New OpenJDK 7u Reviewer: Martin Balao

On 21/05/2020 21:09, Andrew Hughes wrote: > I hereby nominate Martin Balao [0] for the role of OpenJDK 7u Reviewer. > > Martin has contributed a significant body of patches to OpenJDK [1] [2] > [3] [4] [5]. He is also doing a lot of work behind the scenes in the > vulnerabilit

CFV: New OpenJDK 7u Reviewer: Martin Balao

I hereby nominate Martin Balao [0] for the role of OpenJDK 7u Reviewer. Martin has contributed a significant body of patches to OpenJDK [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. He is also doing a lot of work behind the scenes in the vulnerability group for our security updates, which sadly can't be evidenced publicly

Re: TLS 1.2

On 18/05/2020 07:50, Neil Meyer wrote: > Hi David, > > Unfortunately that didnt work it will only work on Java 7 update 95 and not > on Update 80 of the Oracle JDK, I would like to know which version of > OpenJDK will work and what update? > > Kind Regards > Neil Meyer > > JDK-7093640, whi

Re: [7u] RFR: 8240621 Build failure on Windows after 8044500

On 05/03/2020 16:57, Dmitry Cherepanov wrote: > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240621 > > Webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcherepanov/openjdk7u/8240621/webrev.v1/ > > Please review a patch that replaces the use of java.time.Instant API > with java.util.Calendar API. > >

[RFR] [7u] jdk7u251-b02/ga

OpenJDK 7u251 has been released: http://bitly.com/oj7u251 Here are the remaining changes for the jdk7u repository: Webrev: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/openjdk7/20200114/ Changes: - S6675699: need comprehensive fix for unconstrained ConvI2L with narrowed type - S6880619: reg tests for

Re: [RFR] [7u] jdk7u251-b02/ga

On 19/02/2020 06:00, Andrew Hughes wrote: > OpenJDK 7u251 has been released: http://bitly.com/oj7u251 > > Here are the remaining changes for the jdk7u repository: > > Webrev: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/openjdk7/20200114/ > > Changes: > - S6675699: ne

OpenJDK 7u251 Released

We are pleased to announce the release of OpenJDK 7u251. The source tarball is available from: * https://openjdk-sources.osci.io/openjdk7/openjdk7u251-ga.tar.xz The tarball is accompanied by a digital signature available at: * https://openjdk-sources.osci.io/openjdk7/openjdk7u251-ga.tar.xz.sig

CFV: New OpenJDK 7u Committer: Martin Balao

I hereby nominate Martin Balao (mbalao) to OpenJDK 7u Committer. Martin has already produced a number of valuable contributions to OpenJDK 7 [0] [1], particularly when it comes to security updates, where he has helped with the backporting work. Votes are due by the 13th of March, 2019, at 16h00 U

Re: CFV: New OpenJDK 7u Committer: Martin Balao

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 01:27, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > I hereby nominate Martin Balao (mbalao) to OpenJDK 7u Committer. > > Martin has already produced a number of valuable contributions to > OpenJDK 7 [0] [1], particularly when it comes to security updates, where > he h

Re: hg: jdk7u/jdk7u: Added tag jdk7u211-b00 for changeset f182d5978cc0

On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 18:15, Prakash Rungta wrote: > > I need to have my self unsubscribe from this list. How it can be done ? > Please advise > > Thanks > Prakash > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 3:04 AM wrote: >> >> Changeset: 73474550d820 >> Author:andrew >> Date: 2019-02-15 05:16 +

Re: RFA 8211435: Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-1" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: null source

On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 19:56, Martin Balao wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to request an approval for the backport of "8211435 - Exception > in thread "AWT-EventQueue-1" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: null > source" [1] to jdk7u. > > * > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8211435/8211435

Re: RFA: 8200659

On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 21:52, Martin Balao wrote: > > I'd like to request the approval of 8200659 backport to jdk7u. > > * > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8200659/8200659.webrev.jdk7u.00/ > * > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8200659/8200659.webrev.jdk7u.00.zip > > Kind r

[PATCH] jdk7u211-b00 security patch review

8u201 was released recently & we've backported appropriate changes to OpenJDK 7 to create OpenJDK 7 u211. The changes from u201-b00 to u211-b00 are as follows: - S6383200: PBE: need new algorithm support in password based encryption - S6483657: MSCAPI provider does not create unique alias name

Re: RFA: 8213154 - Update copyright headers of files in src tree that are missing Classpath exception

On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 16:34, Martin Balao wrote: > > Hi, > > Can I have the backport of 8213154 [0] approved for jdk7u? > > * > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8213154/8213154.webrev.01.jdk7u/ > * > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8213154/8213154.webrev.01.jdk7u.zip > > Th

Re: [RFR - 7u]: 8029661: Support TLS v1.2 algorithm in SunPKCS11 provider

On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 15:04, Martin Balao wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to propose a backport of SunPKCS11 + TLS 1.2 enhancement to jdk7u: > > * > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8029661/8029661.webrev.12.jdk7u/ > * > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8029661/8029661.webrev.12

OpenJDK7 u201 b00 Released

The tarball is available here: https://openjdk-sources.osci.io/openjdk7/openjdk7u201-b00.tar.xz The tarball is accompanied by a digital signature available at: https://openjdk-sources.osci.io/openjdk7/openjdk7u201-b00.tar.xz.sig PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerp

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u201-b00 security patch review

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 16:38, Mario Torre wrote: > > I did proof read the patches too, it's good to go for me. > > Cheers, > Mario > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 5:36 PM Martin Balao wrote: Thanks. Pushed. -- Andrew :) Senior Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Web Site

Result: New OpenJDK 7u Committer: Andrew Dinn

Voting for Andrew Dinn [0] is now closed. Yes: 5 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 Turnout: 3% (5/172) According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus [1], this is sufficient to approve the nomination. [0] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2018-September/010821.html [1] https://openjdk.ja

Re: New OpenJDK 7 Reviewer: Mario Torre

On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 at 07:48, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote: > > vote: yest > > Best regards, > Goetz. > Hi Goetz, Sorry, but I'm afraid you're only listed as a Committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates [0], so I can't accept this vote on the reviewer nomination. [0] https://openjdk.java.net/census#goetz T

Re: CFV: New OpenJDK 7 Reviewer: Mario Torre

On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 at 16:50, Volker Simonis wrote: > > Vote: yes > Hi Volker, Sorry, but you're only listed as an Author for OpenJDK 7 Updates [0], so I can't accept your vote on this reviewer nomination. [0] https://openjdk.java.net/census#simonis Thanks, -- Andrew :) Senior Free Java Soft

Result: New OpenJDK 7u Reviewer: Mario Torre

Voting for Mario Torre [0] is now closed. Yes: 3 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 Invalid: 2 Turnout: 5% (3/65) According to the Bylaws definition of Three-Vote Consensus [1], this is sufficient to approve the nomination. [0] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2018-September/010820.html [1] ht

[PATCH] jdk7u201-b00 security patch review

8u191 was released recently & we've backported appropriate changes to OpenJDK 7 to create OpenJDK 7 u201. The changes from u191-b02 to u201-b00 are as follows: - S7058700: Unexpected exceptions and timeouts in SF2 parser code - S7098755: test/sun/misc/JarIndex/metaInfFilenames/Basic.java shoul

Re: CFV: New OpenJDK 7 Reviewer: Mario Torre

On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 at 04:20, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > I hereby nominate Mario Torre for the role of OpenJDK 7 Reviewer. > > Mario has been active within the OpenJDK project since its inception, > being originally a contributor to the GNU Classpath project. His > work has

CFV: New OpenJDK 7 Committer: Andrew Dinn

I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) [0] to OpenJDK 7 Committer. Andrew co-wrote the original AArch64 port [1] and is the the author of 32 patches in the OpenJDK sources [2]. He is already a reviewer for OpenJDK 9+. Votes are due by the 27th of September, 2018, at 16h00 UTC. Only current OpenJ

CFV: New OpenJDK 7 Reviewer: Mario Torre

I hereby nominate Mario Torre for the role of OpenJDK 7 Reviewer. Mario has been active within the OpenJDK project since its inception, being originally a contributor to the GNU Classpath project. His work has mainly been in the graphics area and he is the lead of the caciocavallo project [0]. In

OpenJDK 7u181 b01 Released

Looks like we missed this one. The tarball is available here: https://openjdk-sources.osci.io/openjdk7/openjdk7u181-b01.tar.xz The tarball is accompanied by a digital signature available at: https://openjdk-sources.osci.io/openjdk7/openjdk7u181-b01.tar.xz.sig PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B3596422

OpenJDK 7u191 b02 Released

The tarball is available here: https://openjdk-sources.osci.io/openjdk7/openjdk7u191-b02.tar.xz The tarball is accompanied by a digital signature available at: https://openjdk-sources.osci.io/openjdk7/openjdk7u191-b02.tar.xz.sig PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerp

Re: [RFR] JDK-8207151: JVM 7u181 crash with SIGSEGV when Tomcat 7 starts

On 15 August 2018 at 16:29, Seán Coffey wrote: > Is this issue also applicable to later JDK family version releases ? Is so, > do you intend to fix there ? > > If not, can you add 8-na label to the bug record ? > > Thanks, > Sean. > > > On 15/08/18 16:11, Andrew Hu

Re: [RFR] JDK-8207151: JVM 7u181 crash with SIGSEGV when Tomcat 7 starts

On 23 July 2018 at 08:56, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 07/12/2018 02:34 AM, Martin Balao wrote: >> I'd like to propose a fix for JDK-8207151 [1]: >> >> * http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8207151/8207151.webrev.01/ >> * http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8207151/8207151.webrev.01.zi

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u191-b01 security patch review

On 1 August 2018 at 16:31, Omair Majid wrote: > Hi, > > * Andrew Hughes [2018-08-01 11:08]: >> Ping? > > Yes, please! Approved. > > (I did not review the fixes) > > Thanks, > Omair > > -- > PGP Key: B157A9F0 (http://pgp.mit.edu/) > Fingerprint = 9D

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u191-b01 security patch review

On 18 July 2018 at 22:09, Andrew Hughes wrote: > 8u181 was released yesterday. We've backported appropriate > changes to OpenJDK 7 to create OpenJDK 7 u191. > > The changes from u181-b01 to u191-b00 are as follows: > - S8005661: [parfait] Possible buffer overrun in > jdk

[PATCH] jdk7u191-b01 security patch review

8u181 was released yesterday. We've backported appropriate changes to OpenJDK 7 to create OpenJDK 7 u191. The changes from u181-b01 to u191-b00 are as follows: - S8005661: [parfait] Possible buffer overrun in jdk/src/solaris/native/sun/awt/awt_GraphicsEnv.c - S8005695: [parfait] Format string

Re: [RFR] JDK-8207151: JVM 7u181 crash with SIGSEGV when Tomcat 7 starts

On 13 July 2018 at 08:36, Andrew Dinn wrote: > On 12 July 2018 at 02:34, Martin Balao wrote:> > I'd like to propose a fix for JDK-8207151 [1]: >> >> * http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8207151/8207151.webrev.01/ >> * http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8207151/8207151.webrev.01.

Re: [RFR] JDK-8207151: JVM 7u181 crash with SIGSEGV when Tomcat 7 starts

On 12 July 2018 at 02:34, Martin Balao wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to propose a fix for JDK-8207151 [1]: > > * http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8207151/8207151.webrev.01/ > * http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8207151/8207151.webrev.01.zip > > This fix has been already reviwed by

Re: [7u-dev] RFA for JDK-8204344: Release session if initialization of SunPKCS11 Signature fails

On 6 June 2018 at 15:38, Martin Balao wrote: > Thanks for review. > > I need you to push it on my behalf, as I don't have permissions to do so. > Done: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/jdk/rev/e146e0fb6dee -- Andrew :) Senior Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.c

Re: [7u-dev] RFA for JDK-8204344: Release session if initialization of SunPKCS11 Signature fails

On 5 June 2018 at 17:10, Martin Balao wrote: > Hi, > > Here there is a backport of JDK-8203182 [1] to JDK7: > > * > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8203182/backports/7/8203182.webrev.01/ > * > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8203182/backports/7/8203182.webrev.01.zip > > Bac

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u181-b01 security patch review

On 23 May 2018 at 07:00, Andrew Brygin wrote: > Hello Andrew, > > the changes look good to me. > > Thanks, > Andrew > >> On May 10, 2018, at 6:41 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote: >> >> 8u171 was released in mid-April and we've backported appropriate >

Re: [RFR - backport]: 8203009 - IDN do not throw IAE when hostname ends with a trailing dot

On 11 May 2018 at 19:39, Martin Balao wrote: > Hi, > > Can I have a review for 8203009 [1]? This bug is a backport of 8020842 [2]. > > * http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8203009/8203009.webrev.00/ > * http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8203009/8203009.webrev.00.zip > > Testing:

OpenJDK 7u171-b02 Release Tarball

The tarball is finally available here: https://openjdk-sources.osci.io/openjdk7/openjdk7u171-b02.tar.xz The tarball is accompanied by a digital signature available at: https://openjdk-sources.osci.io/openjdk7/openjdk7u171-b02.tar.xz.sig PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)

[PATCH] jdk7u181-b01 security patch review

8u171 was released in mid-April and we've backported appropriate changes to OpenJDK 7 to create OpenJDK 7 u181. The changes from u171-b02 to u181-b00 are as follows: - S7132338: Use @code friendly idiom for '\' in javadoc - S8001419: Build the JCE portion of JDK-8000970 - S8019360: Cleanup o

Re: Patch support for Open JDK 7

On 26 March 2018 at 12:14, dalibor topic wrote: > On 26.03.2018 13:05, Andrew Haley wrote: >> >> On 03/26/2018 11:50 AM, dalibor topic wrote: >>> >>> On 26.03.2018 11:30, Andrew Haley wrote: > > Are these identical to the patch updates offered by Oracle. They are intended to

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u171-b02 security patch review

On 15 February 2018 at 21:43, Andrew Hughes wrote: > 8u161 was released in mid-January and we've backported appropriate > changes to OpenJDK 7 to create OpenJDK 7 u171. > > Unlike with previous releases, I'm posting these changes first, while > we are still doing rele

[PATCH] jdk7u171-b02 security patch review

8u161 was released in mid-January and we've backported appropriate changes to OpenJDK 7 to create OpenJDK 7 u171. Unlike with previous releases, I'm posting these changes first, while we are still doing release testing on them. This gives time for others to test these changes and propose any furth

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u161-b01 retro-active security patch review

On 20 December 2017 at 19:20, Dmitry Cherepanov wrote: > Looks good to me. Thanks. > > Dmitry > >> On Dec 8, 2017, at 9:11 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: >> >> We have a new release of IcedTea (http://bitly.com/it20612) and a new OpenJDK >> 7 release, u161-b01,

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u161-b01 retro-active security patch review

On 8 December 2017 at 18:11, Andrew Hughes wrote: > We have a new release of IcedTea (http://bitly.com/it20612) and a new OpenJDK > 7 release, u161-b01, to go with it. This is made from the current state of the > OpenJDK 7u repositories plus backports of the new security fixes > inclu

[PATCH] jdk7u161-b01 retro-active security patch review

We have a new release of IcedTea (http://bitly.com/it20612) and a new OpenJDK 7 release, u161-b01, to go with it. This is made from the current state of the OpenJDK 7u repositories plus backports of the new security fixes included in 8u151. The tarball is available here: https://openjdk-sources.o

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u151-b01 retro-active security patch review

On 31 August 2017 at 18:56, Dmitry Cherepanov wrote: > Looks good to me. > > Thanks, > > Dmitry > >> On Aug 10, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote: >> >> We have a new release of IcedTea (http://bitly.com/it20610) and a new OpenJDK >> 7 release, u151

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u151-b01 retro-active security patch review

On 11 August 2017 at 16:13, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote: > Hi, > > the ppc part looks good. Thanks for adapting the ad rules to > the port in 7. > This is really good to hear! Thanks. > Best regards, > Goetz. > Best regards, -- Andrew :) Senior Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http:

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u151-b01 retro-active security patch review

On 10 August 2017 at 08:18, Andrew Hughes wrote: > We have a new release of IcedTea (http://bitly.com/it20610) and a new OpenJDK > 7 release, u151-b01, to go with it. This is made from the current state of the > OpenJDK 7u repositories plus backports of the new security fixes > inclu

[PATCH] jdk7u151-b01 retro-active security patch review

We have a new release of IcedTea (http://bitly.com/it20610) and a new OpenJDK 7 release, u151-b01, to go with it. This is made from the current state of the OpenJDK 7u repositories plus backports of the new security fixes included in 8u141 and 8u144. The tarball is available here: https://openjdk

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u141-b02 retro-active security patch review

On 24 May 2017 at 18:21, Andrew Brygin wrote: > Hello Andrew, > > the changes look good to me. > > Thanks, > Andrew > Thanks. Pushed. -- Andrew :) Senior Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Web Site: http://fuseyism.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_jav

[PATCH] jdk7u141-b02 retro-active security patch review

We have a new release of IcedTea (http://bitly.com/it20610) and a new OpenJDK 7 release, u141-b02, to go with it. This is made from the current state of the OpenJDK 7u repositories plus backports of the new security fixes included in 8u131. Unfortunately, we are currently unable to provide a relea

Re: Jmap -heap on all OpenJDK 1.7.79+ on Linux x86_64 crash

- Original Message - > > I believe at one time it was possible to tell RPM to omit the symbol table > > from stripping, but it seems this is no longer the case. Other > > distributions > > suffer in the same way (I've observed it on Gentoo as well). > > Surely we just need to revert what

Re: Jmap -heap on all OpenJDK 1.7.79+ on Linux x86_64 crash

- Original Message - > Well, well, well. Installing -debuginfo resulted in a successful run with and > without using GDB. > I uninstalled -debuginfo and the exception came back. > Yes. It's because the symbol table is removed from libjvm.so as part of packaging and moved into a separate

Re: Jmap -heap on all OpenJDK 1.7.79+ on Linux x86_64 crash

- Original Message - > I'll take a look at this one. Andrew, do you know if there is any > Red Hat bug report? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010786 Already assigned to you as well. -- Andrew :) Senior Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Re: Jmap -heap on all OpenJDK 1.7.79+ on Linux x86_64 crash

- Original Message - > > I ran across this bug report > > (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-7/+bug/1548434) and it > > seems in Wheezy/Jessie it's likewise. The last functional version I just > > so happened to hold onto is 7u79-2.5.5-1~deb7u1. > > > > The following are

Re: [ping] RFR(S): 8175163: [bsd] Fix build after "8005629: javac warnings compiling java.awt.EventDispatchThread..."

- Original Message - > Hi, > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr17/8175163-macErr3/webrev.01/ > I also updated this tob e based on u131. > > Best regards, > Goetz. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Lindenmaier, Goetz > > Sent: Freitag, 17. Februar 2017 10:44 > > To: jdk7u-

Re: [ping] RE: RFR(S): 8175087: [bsd] Fix build after "8024900: PPC64: Enable new build on AIX (jdk part)"

- Original Message - > Hi, > > I updated the webrev to be based on u131. > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr17/8175087-macErr/webrev.01/ > > Best regards, > Goetz. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Lindenmaier, Goetz > > Sent: Freitag, 17. Februar 2017 10:42 > > To: jdk7u

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u131-b00 retro-active security patch review

- Original Message - > Hi Andrew, > > the change looks good to me. > > Thanks, > Andrew > Thanks Andrew & Goetz. Changes pushed. -- Andrew :) Senior Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Web Site: http://fuseyism.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_and

Re: RFR: [jdk7u] 8028471: PPC64 (part 215): opto: Extend ImplicitNullCheck optimization.

- Original Message - > Hi > > I would like to downport 8028471 from jdk8 to jdk7. > Major parts of this change came with bulk checkin > > "8165807: PPC64: Backport > PPC64 port to OpenJDK 7" > > 8165807 is an amalgam of the early chan

Re: Changeset de5e8c8a9b87 breaks osx build

- Original Message - > Hey guys, > > out of curiosity I started to do my own OpenJDK7 builds for OSX. I can build > until 7u111, but > starting with 7u121 the build fails with this: > > openjdk7/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/callGenerator.cpp:204: error: > 'zero_page_read_protected' is not

[PATCH] jdk7u131-b00 retro-active security patch review

We have a new release of IcedTea (http://bitly.com/it20609) and a new OpenJDK 7 release, u131-b00, to go with it. This is made from the current state of the OpenJDK 7u repositories plus backports of the new security fixes included in 8u121. The tarball is available here: https://java.net/project

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u121-b00 retro-active security patch review

- Original Message - > Hello Andrew, > > patches look fine to me. > > Thanks, > Andrew > Thank you! Pushed. -- Andrew :) Senior Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u121-b00 retro-active security patch review

; Goetz. > > > -Original Message- > > From: jdk7u-dev [mailto:jdk7u-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of > > Andrew Hughes > > Sent: Dienstag, 10. Januar 2017 23:28 > > To: jdk7u-dev > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] jdk7u121-b00 retro-

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u121-b00 retro-active security patch review

- Original Message - > > > - Original Message - > > We have a new release of IcedTea (http://bitly.com/it20608) and a new > > OpenJDK > > 7 release, u121-b00, to go with it. This is made from the current state of > > the > > OpenJDK 7u repositories plus backports of the new secu

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u121-b00 retro-active security patch review

- Original Message - > We have a new release of IcedTea (http://bitly.com/it20608) and a new OpenJDK > 7 release, u121-b00, to go with it. This is made from the current state of > the > OpenJDK 7u repositories plus backports of the new security fixes included in > 8u111. > > The tarball

Re: broken SSA-224 in jdk7u111?

- Original Message - > - Original Message - > > At Google we've merged jdk7u111 into our jdk7 repo, and we're seeing some > > jtreg failures. > > > > These 10 stand out collectively: > > > > com/sun/crypto/provider/Cipher/RSA/TestOAEP.java > > com/sun/crypto/provider/Cipher/

[PATCH] jdk7u121-b00 retro-active security patch review

We have a new release of IcedTea (http://bitly.com/it20608) and a new OpenJDK 7 release, u121-b00, to go with it. This is made from the current state of the OpenJDK 7u repositories plus backports of the new security fixes included in 8u111. The tarball is available here: https://java.net/project

Re: Backport Request: 8058197: AWT fails on generic non-reparenting window managers

- Original Message - > Hi, > > Could you please avail the following patch backport? > > As the bug report[1] states, this change has been applied for quite a > while on various linux distros during packaging (although in a slight > longer version). > > # HG changeset patch > # User azv

Re: [7u-dev] Backport Request: 7172652: With JDK 1.7 text field does not obtain focus when using mnemonic Alt/Key combin

- Original Message - > Hello, > > Could you please approve straight backport for below bug fix to JDK7 ? > > Description: > This is a bug in Label UI's key release event processing routine for key > mnemonics: only one release event is captured instead of two(Alt release > and the mnemoni

Re: Merge AIX/PPC64 Port

l works fine. > > Ok to push from my side! > Great! I did builds on ppc64[le,be] on Linux, but yeah, obviously not on AIX :) I was hoping you would... ;) So just need approval from a reviewer now and I can push this. > Best regards, > Goetz. > > > > -Origi

[RFR] [PATCH] Merge AIX/PPC64 Port

As discussed previously [0], this is the proposed merge of the PPC/AIX port [1] into OpenJDK 7u. The merge was created as previously discussed. One changeset was created for the initial group of changes without bug IDs, and then the remaining changesets were added by cherry-picking those changeset

Re: RFR [7] 8133206: "java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread" caused by upgrade to zlib 1.2.8

- Original Message - > Hello, > > I'd like to ask again for integration approval for the following fix > in core-libs area: > - Bug report: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133206 > - Webrev of the fix: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nikgor/8133206/jdk7u-dev/webrev.01/ > I

Re: broken SSA-224 in jdk7u111?

- Original Message - > At Google we've merged jdk7u111 into our jdk7 repo, and we're seeing some > jtreg failures. > > These 10 stand out collectively: > > com/sun/crypto/provider/Cipher/RSA/TestOAEP.java > com/sun/crypto/provider/Cipher/RSA/TestOAEPWithParams.java > com/sun/crypto/

Re: [PATCH] jdk7u111-b01 retro-active security patch review

- Original Message - > * Andrew Hughes [2016-07-29 13:55]: > > We have a new release of IcedTea (http://bitly.com/it20607) and a new > > OpenJDK > > 7 release, u111-b01, to go with it. This is made from the current state of > > the > > OpenJDK 7u repos

[PATCH] jdk7u111-b01 retro-active security patch review

We have a new release of IcedTea (http://bitly.com/it20607) and a new OpenJDK 7 release, u111-b01, to go with it. This is made from the current state of the OpenJDK 7u repositories plus backports of the new security fixes included in 8u101. The tarball is available here: https://java.net/project

Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

- Original Message - > Hi Andrew, > > > at this, and then you can critique > > the result rather than what you think I'm saying. > That's good! Facts not theory! > > > However, I don't see > > the sudden rush for this. We're not having another release until October. > I started working

Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

- Original Message - > Hi Andrew :), > > sorry, I don't understand. > > > $ hg pull -r 9ee6abf28de9 ../../ppc7/hotspot > This will give you most of the changes we did without openJdk bugid. > Just the ones Andrew Ha. doesn't want at all as I understand. > You will have to do some meanin

Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

- Original Message - > Hmm, I don't feel like taking the changes in ppc-aix-port/jdk7u apart, > and re-assembling them in jdk7u/jdk7u. > Bugs and porting efforts (like porting to LE) are mixed. > > I would either do a hg pull from ppc-aix-port/jdk7u to jdk7u/jdk7u > or plain diff / patch /

Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

- Original Message - > On 21/07/16 17:29, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > When backporting changes, you find differences between e.g. 7 and 8, > > and you need this kind of data mining, from tools like hg annotate, in > > order to establish why that change exists and wh

Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

- Original Message - > On 21/07/16 16:52, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > As a compromise, I suggest doing a single patch for the main > > patch import (up to changeset 9ee6abf28de9) which corresponds > > to the whole port in the same way the initial AArch64 port was >

Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

- Original Message - > On 21/07/16 15:46, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > > > > > - Original Message - > >> On 11/07/16 16:33, Andrew Hughes wrote: > >> > >>>>> On 11/07/16 15:28, Andrew Hughes wrote: > >>>>> I

Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

> From: jdk7u-dev [mailto:jdk7u-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf > > Of Andrew Haley > > Sent: Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2016 12:10 > > To: Andrew Hughes > > Cc: jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net > > Subject: Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev > > > > On 11/07/

Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

- Original Message - > On 11/07/16 16:33, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > >>> On 11/07/16 15:28, Andrew Hughes wrote: > >>> I don't really want to lose all the history with just one huge > >>> patch either. > >> > >> In practice

Re: RFR(XS): 8161262: Fix jdk build with gcc 4.1.2: -fno-strict-overflow not known.

- Original Message - > Hi, > > we are building the jdk7u ppc port on gcc 4.1.2. This fails since > "8147466: Add -fno-strict-overflow to IndicRearrangementProcessor{,2}.cpp" > as the gcc flag introduced there is not known to gcc 4.1.2. > I just guard it by the compiler version. > > Pleas

Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

- Original Message - > On 11/07/16 15:28, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > I don't really want to lose all the history with just one huge > > patch either. > > In practice, from merging in ports, that is by far the best thing > to do. The history can be

Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

test the merging that's needed. There were some actual > edits necessary. Yes, making sure 7u101 works on ppc would be a good idea! :) There are PPC fixes from IcedTea which will need to be merged too. Probably easiest to do that in a merged OpenJDK 7u at the beginning of the next rele

Result: CFV: New OpenJDK 7u Committer: Goetz Lindenmaier

The deadline for voting passed on the 5th of July, 2016. [0] Results are as follows: Yes: 6 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 Turnout: 4% (6/171) I hereby declare Goetz Lindenmaier elected to the position of OpenJDK 7u committer, according to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus [1]. [0] http://mail.open

Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev

- Original Message - > Hi, > > I assembled webrevs for merging the ppc port from > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/ppc-aix-port/jdk7u/hotspot/ > into the main jdk7u repository: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/ppc-port/tree1/ > > There are no changes to jaxp (besides to the .hgtags f

[PATCH] 8151841: Build needs additional flags to compile with GCC 6

Webrevs: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/openjdk7/8151841/hotspot/ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/openjdk7/8151841/jdk/ Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151841 The OpenJDK build needs some additional flags for building with GCC 6. These have been added in OpenJDK 9 [0] and

Re: Compilation failure related to Time [Error: time is more than 10,years from present: 1136059200000]

RearrangementProcessor2.o := -fwrapv > > > > Thanks a lot for the inputs. > > > > Thanks > > Prakash Rungta. > > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Andrew Hughes > > wrote: > > > >> - Original Message - > >> &

Re: Compilation failure related to Time [Error: time is more than 10,years from present: 1136059200000]

- Original Message - > Hi Prakash, > > On 06/23/2016 12:48 PM, Prakash Rungta wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > Thanks for the response. Is there something that you would want me to try. > > I complied couple of times and getting the same error. > > GCC version 4.3 i did not get for the RHEL 5

Re: Compilation failure related to Time [Error: time is more than 10,years from present: 1136059200000]

- Original Message - > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Prakash Rungta > wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > Thanks for looking into this. > > > > I downloaded the source code from the following site > > > > http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk7/ > > > > The following was the file name > > > >

Re: CFV: New OpenJDK 7u Committer: Goetz Lindenmaier

- Original Message - > I hereby nominate Goetz Lindenmaier (goetz) [0] for the role of OpenJDK 7u > committer. > > Goetz has done significant work on the PPC + AIX port of OpenJDK and making > him a committer to the OpenJDK 7u project would help in the process of moving > the OpenJDK 7 ver

CFV: New OpenJDK 7u Committer: Goetz Lindenmaier

I hereby nominate Goetz Lindenmaier (goetz) [0] for the role of OpenJDK 7u committer. Goetz has done significant work on the PPC + AIX port of OpenJDK and making him a committer to the OpenJDK 7u project would help in the process of moving the OpenJDK 7 version of that port from its current locat

  1   2   3   >