ow promoted the change correcting the testcase (to Sean's jdk7u
version) under the new bug id, 8020625 [1].
Regards,
Neil
[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/99a30047d18a
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 11:17 +0800, Shi Jun Zhang wrote:
Hi Sean,
I think Neil pushed the changeset
sue ?
regards,
Sean.
On 16/07/2013 14:45, Neil Richards wrote:
Now pushed to jdk7u-dev/jdk [1].
Regards,
Neil
[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/b0b15e373002
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 13:56 +0800, Shi Jun Zhang wrote:
On 7/13/2013 4:27 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Shi Jun,
this is
On 7/13/2013 4:27 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Shi Jun,
this is approved for jdk7u40-dev integration. Please push the fix when
you get time.
regards,
Sean.
On 11/07/13 04:06, Shi Jun Zhang wrote:
On 7/11/2013 2:18 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Shi Jun Zhang,
Let me get QA approval for this issue and
On 7/11/2013 2:18 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Shi Jun Zhang,
Let me get QA approval for this issue and I'll get back to you
shortly. Is this a must fix request for 7u40 ?
regards,
Sean.
On 10/07/13 09:34, Shi Jun Zhang wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to request for approval to push the follow
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-June/018450.html
There are some differences between webrev for jdk7u and jdk8. The reason
is that some change in jdk8 which invokes isEmpty() is only fixed in
jdk8 and not back ported to jdk7u. The jtreg test is modified accordingly.
--
Regards,
Sh
we need to fully
understand any behavior changes before this is considered for a 7u
release.
-Alan.
On 17/09/2012 09:14, Shi Jun Zhang wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to request for approval to push the following change into
7u10.
Changeset in jdk8
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/81
dress a specific issue you are
running into, then we should investigate further any potential
compatibility issues. Otherwise, it may be best to simply not
backport in this case.
-Chris.
-Alan.
On 17/09/2012 09:14, Shi Jun Zhang wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to request for approval t
Pavel - Are you ok with latest webrev ?
Regards,
Sean.
[1]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2012-July/003865.html
On 17/09/2012 07:59, Shi Jun Zhang wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to request for approval to push the following change into 7u10.
Changeset in jdk8
http://hg.openjd
a.net/pipermail/net-dev/2011-November/003778.html
This patch is based on its previous patch I posted just now.
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2012-September/004449.html
--
Regards,
Shi Jun Zhang
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2011-November/003702.html
--
Regards,
Shi Jun Zhang
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2011-November/003702.html
--
Regards,
Shi Jun Zhang
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2012-June/002919.html
--
Regards,
Shi Jun Zhang
a.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2011-August/001697.html
--
Regards,
Shi Jun Zhang
a.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2012-May/000630.html
--
Regards,
Shi Jun Zhang
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-May/010322.html
--
Regards,
Shi Jun Zhang
a.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2012-March/001936.html
--
Regards,
Shi Jun Zhang
a.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2011-March/001455.html
--
Regards,
Shi Jun Zhang
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-March/009445.html
--
Regards,
Shi Jun Zhang
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nio-dev/2012-March/001594.html
--
Regards,
Shi Jun Zhang
19 matches
Mail list logo