2020/11/4 13:24:56 -0800, tim.b...@oracle.com:
> Andrew Haley resigned as JDK 7u project lead [1].
>
> Andrew Brygin offered to take over leadership of JDK 7u. [2] I have no
> other nominations.
>
> Under the bylaws for Project Roles [3], a new Project Lead may be
> nominated by the Group Lead
2018/9/14 0:27:13 -0700, sean.cof...@oracle.com:
> On 13/09/2018 23:50, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
>> 2018/9/12 20:30:40 -0700, Andrew Hughes :
>>> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) [0] to OpenJDK 7 Committer.
>>>
>>> Andrew co-wrote the original AArch64 port [1] and is the the author of
2018/9/12 20:30:40 -0700, Andrew Hughes :
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) [0] to OpenJDK 7 Committer.
>
> Andrew co-wrote the original AArch64 port [1] and is the the author of 32
> patches in the OpenJDK sources [2]. He is already a reviewer for OpenJDK 9+.
>
> Votes are due by the 27th
2015/5/28 11:54 -0700, tim.b...@oracle.com:
> Dalibor Topic has resigned as lead for the JDK 7 Updates Project [1].
> Under the bylaws for Project Roles [2], a new Project Lead may be
> nominated by the Group Leads of the Project's sponsoring groups.
>
> The Build Infrastructure Group is sponsor
2015/1/20 9:26 -0800, dalibor.to...@oracle.com:
> On 20.01.2015 18:19, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Okay, so does that mean I have to petition the GB to get this done,
>> or could Kelly do this retroactively?
>
> The nomination of a new Project Lead would have to take place sometime
> in April. I'd assu
2013/6/18 10:02 -0700, joe.da...@oracle.com:
> On 6/18/2013 12:49 AM, alexey zhebel wrote:
>> We are moving to a new process for generating man pages. I checked in
>> the two that changed for 7u40 (java and jcmd):
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~azhebel/8016767/
>>
>> Please review.
>>
>> Note th
Changeset: d17acb2ee133
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-05-01 14:51 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jaxp/rev/d17acb2ee133
Added tag jdk7u40-b23 for changeset 0e4c549d3635
! .hgtags
Changeset: 2b5900f0bc6a
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-05-08 16:52 -0700
URL:
2012/10/22 12:06 -0700, christian.thalin...@oracle.com:
> On Oct 22, 2012, at 11:39 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
>> So if I don't use invokedynamic at all then none of these changes
>> are relevant?
>
> Correct. Only when you run a program that uses any JSR 292
> functionality the 292 subs
2012/10/18 12:17 -0700, christian.thalin...@oracle.com:
> On Oct 18, 2012, at 12:00 PM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
>> Um, isn't this an awfully big change for what's supposed to be a low-risk
>> update release?
>
> It's big, indeed. But actually it's a bug fix and it only touches JSR
> 292 r
2012/10/18 11:54 -0700, christian.thalin...@oracle.com:
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/8000999/
> 8000999: backport of JSR 292 to 7u
>
> This is an umbrella bug for these changes (which are backported in one
> changeset):
>
> ...
Um, isn't this an awfully big change for what's supp
2012/6/22 9:24 -0700, philip.r...@oracle.com:
> On 6/22/2012 1:11 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
>> I didn't realise openjdk7 repo allowed duplicate bug IDs. Is there a reason
>> for that ?
If memory serves, Dalibor requested this after it'd become difficult
to merge HotSpot into jdk7u.
>> Do we have any
2012/6/21 15:13 -0700, philip.r...@oracle.com:
> Hmm .. and since I used that bug ID a few days ago in the same repo,
> jcheck should have caught that, shouldn't it ? Maybe I don't have it
> configured right on my Mac? And I expect this is going to be a problem.
Won't be a problem. The jdk7u repo
2012/2/13 3:59 -0800, edvard.wende...@oracle.com:
> It seems like some emails aren't getting through to the jdk7u-dev mailing
> list. That means that we might not get your approval requests. If you one
> waiting for response from one of the maintainers and you haven't seen any
> activity for 3-4 da
13 matches
Mail list logo
