- Original Message -
> Hi Andrew,
>
> > at this, and then you can critique
> > the result rather than what you think I'm saying.
> That's good! Facts not theory!
>
> > However, I don't see
> > the sudden rush for this. We're not having another release until October.
> I started working
g from the preceding
> changeset,
> but I'll check.
All before that is mere porting changes, some without bugIDs.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Hughes [mailto:gnu.and...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 6:14 PM
> To: Lindenmaier,
- Original Message -
> Hi Andrew :),
>
> sorry, I don't understand.
>
> > $ hg pull -r 9ee6abf28de9 ../../ppc7/hotspot
> This will give you most of the changes we did without openJdk bugid.
> Just the ones Andrew Ha. doesn't want at all as I understand.
> You will have to do some meanin
used.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Hughes [mailto:gnu.and...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Freitag, 22. Juli 2016 14:57
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Cc: Andrew Haley ; jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev
>
> - Original
- Original Message -
> Hmm, I don't feel like taking the changes in ppc-aix-port/jdk7u apart,
> and re-assembling them in jdk7u/jdk7u.
> Bugs and porting efforts (like porting to LE) are mixed.
>
> I would either do a hg pull from ppc-aix-port/jdk7u to jdk7u/jdk7u
> or plain diff / patch /
; Andrew Hughes
>
> Cc: jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: RE: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev
>
> Hmm, I don't feel like taking the changes in ppc-aix-port/jdk7u apart,
> and re-assembling them in jdk7u/jdk7u.
> Bugs and porting efforts (like porting to LE) are mixed.
>
pull subsequent patches without pulling the changes below.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Haley [mailto:a...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Freitag, 22. Juli 2016 11:00
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Andrew Hughes
>
> Cc: jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subjec
On 22/07/16 09:35, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> Hmm, I would not consider the original port broken, it's what we used
> productive for several years before.
> Sure the code that exists now has some issues fixed (7 I think), but that's
> only
> the normal continuous bugfixing you have in any produ
u have in any product.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: jdk7u-dev [mailto:jdk7u-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf
> Of Andrew Haley
> Sent: Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2016 18:52
> To: Andrew Hughes
> Cc: jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: Merge ppc
- Original Message -
> On 21/07/16 17:29, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > When backporting changes, you find differences between e.g. 7 and 8,
> > and you need this kind of data mining, from tools like hg annotate, in
> > order to establish why that change exists and whether or not it needs
> >
On 21/07/16 17:29, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> When backporting changes, you find differences between e.g. 7 and 8,
> and you need this kind of data mining, from tools like hg annotate, in
> order to establish why that change exists and whether or not it needs
> to be kept.
Yes, but I am still far from
- Original Message -
> On 21/07/16 16:52, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > As a compromise, I suggest doing a single patch for the main
> > patch import (up to changeset 9ee6abf28de9) which corresponds
> > to the whole port in the same way the initial AArch64 port was
> > done, and gets rid of th
On 21/07/16 16:52, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> As a compromise, I suggest doing a single patch for the main
> patch import (up to changeset 9ee6abf28de9) which corresponds
> to the whole port in the same way the initial AArch64 port was
> done, and gets rid of the problematic changesets.
>
> The remain
- Original Message -
> On 21/07/16 15:46, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 11/07/16 16:33, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >>
> > On 11/07/16 15:28, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > I don't really want to lose all the history with just one huge
> > patch
On 21/07/16 15:46, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On 11/07/16 16:33, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>
> On 11/07/16 15:28, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I don't really want to lose all the history with just one huge
> patch either.
In practice, from merging in po
> From: jdk7u-dev [mailto:jdk7u-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf
> > Of Andrew Haley
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2016 12:10
> > To: Andrew Hughes
> > Cc: jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net
> > Subject: Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev
> >
> > On 11/07/
- Original Message -
> On 11/07/16 16:33, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
> >>> On 11/07/16 15:28, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >>> I don't really want to lose all the history with just one huge
> >>> patch either.
> >>
> >> In practice, from merging in ports, that is by far the best thing
> >> to do.
rom: Andrew Haley [mailto:a...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2016 15:31
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Andrew Hughes
>
> Cc: jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev
>
> On 21/07/16 14:29, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> > it's the
On 21/07/16 14:29, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> it's the same as in jdk9, except for the C1 port and maybe some recent
> implemented
> intrinsics. We'll continue downporting fixes. We supply the security fixes
> so that
> Oracle can push them for ppc right away, too. Sometimes processes are in
s,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Haley [mailto:a...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2016 14:14
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Andrew Hughes
>
> Cc: jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev
>
> On 21/07/16 11:20, Li
On 21/07/16 11:20, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> so I open a bug "PPC/AIX port for jdk7u" and description
> "This change contains all changes for the ppc port from ppc-aix-port/jdk7u"
> and just patch in all the diffs?
>
> If I do this this week, is there a chance I can push this by 28.7.?
> I'm on
or 3 weeks.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: jdk7u-dev [mailto:jdk7u-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf
> Of Andrew Haley
> Sent: Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2016 12:10
> To: Andrew Hughes
> Cc: jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: Merge ppc port into j
On 11/07/16 16:33, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>> On 11/07/16 15:28, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>> I don't really want to lose all the history with just one huge
>>> patch either.
>>
>> In practice, from merging in ports, that is by far the best thing
>> to do. The history can be found in the development tr
- Original Message -
> On 11/07/16 15:28, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > I don't really want to lose all the history with just one huge
> > patch either.
>
> In practice, from merging in ports, that is by far the best thing
> to do. The history can be found in the development tree.
>
> Andre
On 11/07/16 15:28, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I don't really want to lose all the history with just one huge
> patch either.
In practice, from merging in ports, that is by far the best thing
to do. The history can be found in the development tree.
Andrew.
ase cycle.
>
> Best regards,
> Goetz.
>
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Hughes [mailto:gnu.and...@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Montag, 11. Juli 2016 16:02
> > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz
> > Cc: jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net
> &g
.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Hughes [mailto:gnu.and...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Montag, 11. Juli 2016 16:02
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Cc: jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: Merge ppc port into jdk7u-dev
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
&g
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> I assembled webrevs for merging the ppc port from
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/ppc-aix-port/jdk7u/hotspot/
> into the main jdk7u repository:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/ppc-port/tree1/
>
> There are no changes to jaxp (besides to the .hgtags f
Hi,
I assembled webrevs for merging the ppc port from
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/ppc-aix-port/jdk7u/hotspot/
into the main jdk7u repository:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/ppc-port/tree1/
There are no changes to jaxp (besides to the .hgtags file)
so I skipped that repo.
Please have a loo
29 matches
Mail list logo
