Trivial patches can be accepted without the provider being an OCA
signatory. However the patch must be provided using OpenJDK technology
so it can't be taken from an external website, but if small enough
should be included inline in an email message.
Thanks,
David
On 20/11/2015 1:45 PM, Quana
- Original Message -
> On 12.11.2015 04:42, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> > if/when the OpenJDK project may develop a more coherent release plan?
>
> You can find the plans for JDK 9 at
> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/ . The plans for JDK 8 Updates are
> linked off the Project pa
--On Friday, November 20, 2015 1:51 PM +1000 David Holmes
wrote:
Trivial patches can be accepted without the provider being an OCA
signatory. However the patch must be provided using OpenJDK technology so
it can't be taken from an external website, but if small enough should be
included inline
--On Thursday, November 19, 2015 10:34 PM -0500 Andrew Hughes
wrote:
[Adding in the 8u mailing list]
- Original Message -
Hi,
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the follow up!
Actually, that won't get you u66 unless you explicitly check out a tag.
The current tip of 8u is currently receiv
[Adding in the 8u mailing list]
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if/when the OpenJDK project may develop a more coherent
> release plan? Right now, there seems to be no consistent strategy, which
> makes it very difficult for downstream consumers of OpenJDK to be able to
>
