Is there a reason why we are missing tags jdk8-b70 ... jdk8-b81 in the
JDK 8 nashorn repo?
-- Jon
hg tags -R nashorn | grep jdk8
jdk8-b120691:55cbc2d00c93
jdk8-b119682:c3343930c73c
jdk8-b118679:8d014b039b44
jdk8-b117
Francis,
The command as you posted it is this:
On 11/24/2013 06:57 PM, Francis ANDRE wrote:
$
'Z:/JDK/jdk8/build/windows-x86-normal-server-release/images/j2sdk-image/bin/javac'
-J
-Xmx768m -J-Dtest.vm.opts=-Xmx768m
-J-Dtest.class.path.prefix='Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtool
s\build\windows-i586\
Francis,
I do note that your /cygdrive/Z paths seem to have been successfully
converted to Z: paths, which is good.
In the rerun part of the file you can see:
-classpath
'Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtools\build\windows-i586\test\langtools\jtreg\JTwork\classes\1\tools\javac\doctree;Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtools\
Vote: yes
On 11/22/2013 05:47 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I hereby nominate Stuart Marks to jdk8 Reviewer.
Stuart has Committer role in the jdk8, jdk7u and lambda projects. He
has been contributing changes to OpenJDK for almost 3 years. He is
author to more than 60 changes in the jdk8 forest and
On 11/06/2013 05:26 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 7/11/2013 7:43 AM, Bhavesh Patel wrote:
Hi All,
Based on the feedback received on the new UI implementation
in JDK 7 javadoc, we have made some minor changes to look and feel of
the API pages generated by javadoc in JDK 8. The JDK API
doc
Vote: yes
On 10/30/2013 08:44 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I hereby nominate Daniel Fuchs to jdk8 Reviewer.
Daniel is on his second tour of duty in Oracle's JDK team. Those on
jmx-dev will remember Daniel from the early years of OpenJDK when he
was contributing changes to JMX. He left for a while
On 11/01/2013 02:25 AM, Francis ANDRE wrote:
Hi
Following is an hg diff output for making the test/Makefile running
the langtools/test on a WXP/Cygwin platform.
FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/z/JDK/jdk8
$ hg diff test/Makefile
diff --git a/test/Makefile b/test/Makefile
--- a/test/Makefile
+++
Voting for Bhavesh Patel [1] is now closed.
Yes: 7
Veto: 0
Abstain: 0
Disqualified: 1 (not a Reviewer)
According to the Bylaws definition of Three-Vote Consensus, this is
sufficient to approve the nomination.
Jonathan Gibbons
[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-October
find/grep before and after?
-- Jon
On 10/30/2013 01:17 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
The changes look good.
It looks like "occured" is the most common spelling error. I wonder
how many instances of this misspelling will remain in the codebase
after your fixes.
s'marks
On 10/30/13 4:43 AM, serge
On 10/22/2013 05:22 AM, sergey malenkov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following huge fix:
fix:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~malenkov/8022746.8.0/
bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8022746
I've replaced all typos with correct words in all documentations and
comments. Our t
Vote: yes
On 10/09/2013 11:51 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
I hereby nominate Seán Coffey (coffeys) to JDK 8 Reviewer.
Seán has worked in the core libraries and networking area since before
the beginning of OpenJDK. Seán is probably best known for his role as
7u maintainer, but as the list of chan
the open by replying to this mailing
list.
For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [2].
Jonathan Gibbons
[1] http://openjdk.java.net/census
[2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#reviewer-vote
Changesets:
$ hg log -M -u bpatel --template "{desc}\n" | grep &q
Vote: yes
On 09/26/2013 02:18 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
I hereby nominate Brent Christian to jdk8 Committer.
Brent has been working on the core libraries for a little less than a year but
has tackled some significant problems including the initial re-write of HashMap
in Java 8 to replace alterna
Vote: yes
On 09/04/2013 02:38 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
I hereby nominate Attila Szegedi to JDK 8 Committer.
Attila is a Reviewer on the Nashorn project. In addition to regularly
reviewing other committers' work, he is actively developing Nashorn on
daily basis and has contributed many changes
Voting for Joel Borggrén-Franck [1] is now closed.
Yes: 9
Veto: 0
Abstain: 0
According to the Bylaws definition of Three-Vote Consensus, this is
sufficient to approve the nomination.
Jonathan Gibbons
[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-August/003049.html
[votes]
Mike
(Repeat with correct subject line)
On 09/12/2013 10:11 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Voting for Joel Borggrén-Franck [1] is now closed.
Yes: 9
Veto: 0
Abstain: 0
According to the Bylaws definition of Three-Vote Consensus, this is
sufficient to approve the nomination.
Jonathan Gibbons
[1
Voting for Jan Lahoda [1] is now closed.
Yes: 13
Veto: 0
Abstain: 0
According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is
sufficient to approve the nomination.
Jonathan Gibbons
[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-August/003063.html
[votes]
Mike Duigou
Omair Majid
Voting for Vicente Romero [1] is now closed.
Yes: 5
Veto: 0
Abstain: 0
According to the Bylaws definition of Three-Vote Consensus, this is
sufficient to approve the nomination.
Jonathan Gibbons
[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-August/003064.html
[votes]
Joe Darcy
Tim
Vote: yes
On 09/04/2013 11:16 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
I hereby nominate Erik Gahlin to JDK 8 Committer.
Erik is a member of the Serviceability team at Oracle and as such has
contributed many changes especially in the area of JConsole. The following are
Erik's commits:
7172176: java/jcons
Vote: yes
On 09/04/2013 02:38 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
I hereby nominate Attila Szegedi to JDK 8 Committer.
Attila is a Reviewer on the Nashorn project. In addition to regularly
reviewing other committers' work, he is actively developing Nashorn on
daily basis and has contributed many changese
On 08/29/2013 09:04 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
wrote:
>
>I hereby nominate Vicente Romero to jdk8 Reviewer.
>
>Vicente has been a contributor to OpenJDK since 2011, and since
>then, he has made a total of 78 contributions and
.
Votes are due by 5 p.m. PDT, September 11.
Only current jdk8 Reviewers [1] are eligible to vote on
this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to
this mailing list.
For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [2].
-- Jonathan Gibbons
[1] http://openjdk.java.net/census
[2] http
].
-- Jonathan Gibbons
[1] http://openjdk.java.net/census
[2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/f657d400c736
user:jlahoda
8022508: javac crashes if the generics arity of a base class is wrong
I hereby nominate Joel Borggrén-Franck to jdk8 Reviewer.
Joel has been an active participant in JDK 8 since joining the LangTools
team over a year ago, as can be seen by his numerous contributions to
the langtools, jdk and hotspot repos [below] in the areas of annotations
and reflection.
Vo
Vote: yes
On 08/26/2013 04:26 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I hereby nominate Paul Sandoz to jdk8 Reviewer.
Paul has been compute bound on the jdk8 project for some time.
Everyone following the Lambda and JSR-335 effort will recognize Paul.
He has been a key contributor to the streams API and impl
Vote: yes
On 08/06/2013 01:18 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
I hereby nominate Marcus Lagergren to jdk8 Committer.
Marcus is a Reviewer on the Nashorn project with many contributed changesets
which are now incorporated in the JDK8 repo. He has also completed many reviews
of Nashorn changes by other c
On 07/25/2013 10:03 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
On 7/24/2013 11:13 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 24/07/2013 5:05 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
Hi,
It was just brought to my attention that the output of java -version is
different on builds of jdk8 when compared to jdk7 [1]:
# java -version
openjdk versi
Vote: yes
On 05/29/2013 12:05 AM, Sven Reimers wrote:
Hi,
I hope this is the correct place to ask. With ea b91 installed from JDK8 I
wanted to use the doclint feature. It seems that is is available from javac
but not from javadoc at the moment, if I look at the help output from javac
-X vs. javadoc -X.
H
Mike,
A Reviewer needs a Three Vote Consensus, not a Lazy Consensus, as you imply.
http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#reviewer
-- Jon
On 05/20/2013 04:41 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
I hereby nominate Brian Goetz to jdk8 project Reviewer.
Brian is the Java Language Architect at Oracle and has been le
|Voting for* Jim Laskey* [1] is now closed.
Yes:*19*
Veto: 0
Abstain:*0*
According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is
sufficient to approve the nomination.
*-- Jon*
[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-April/002366.html|
|Voting for* Athijegannathan Sundararajan (Sundar)* [1] is now closed.
Yes:*16*
Veto: 0
Abstain:*0*
According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is
sufficient to approve the nomination.
*Jon*
[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-April/002367.html|
Vote: yes
On 05/08/2013 09:11 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I hereby nominate Paul Sandoz to jdk8 Committer.
Everyone following the Lambda and JSR-335 effort will recognize Paul.
He has been a key contributor to the streams API and implementation,
the spliterator API, the extensive tests and more.
I hereby nominate Jim Laskey to JDK8 Committer.
Jim Laskey is the Lead on the OpenJDK Nashorn Project [1]. Jim joined the FX
Script compiler team in January of 2009 and has been a member of the LangTools
team since fall of 2010 when work on Nashorn began. Jim has contributed
several changes
I hereby nominate Athijegannathan Sundararajan (Sundar) to JDK8 Reviewer.
Sundararajan has been with Sun/Oracle from Oct 2000. He has been involved JDK
projects from jdk 1.3.1. In jdk6, he did jsr223 (javax.script) and Rhino
changes. In jdk7, few javac, javadoc fixes. In jdk8, he has been wit
|Voting for*Eric McCorkle* [1] is now closed.
Yes:*17*
Veto: 0
Abstain:*0*
According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is
sufficient to approve the nomination.
*Jon*
[1]*http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-March/002142.html*|
Dave,
The fixes for langtools look good to me. Thanks for catching these.
-- Jon
On 04/12/2013 09:06 AM, David Katleman wrote:
Below are corrections to GPL headers found in JDK8 b85:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~katleman/8012048/webrev.hotspot.01/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~katleman/8012
Vote: yes
On 03/22/2013 08:48 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I hereby nominate Erik Joelsson to jdk8 Reviewer.
Erik has Committer role on the jdk8 and build-infra projects. He is
the author of more than 70 changes pushed to the jdk8 forest over the
last 9 months. He has also been reviewer/co-review
I hereby nominate Eric McCorkle to JDK8 Committer.
Eric joined the Langtools team at Oracle a while back, and has already
contributed several changes to the JDK 8 repositories.
In jdk8/tl/langtools:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/d04960f05593
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl
o a single file (plus a new test-ng test for the
changes) - how best to persuade webrev.ksh to do the right thing from
within the jdk repo?
Thanks,
Ben
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
wrote:
hg: unknown command 'foutgoing'
Means you either don't have the fore
hg: unknown command 'foutgoing'
Means you either don't have the forest extension installed or it doesn't
work on Mercurial 2.5.1
-- Jon
On 03/09/2013 10:54 AM, Ben Evans wrote:
Hi,
I can't seem to create a webrev on Mac 10.7, Mercurial 2.5.1 - the
webrev script fails with the below output
On 03/05/2013 01:14 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
We could certainly make test depend upon images. I considered but did not
implement this because I imagined that doing so would result in inevitable
complaints about overhead and/or unwanted building. On my system an images
target rebuild with no wor
Voting for Joel Borggrén-Franck [1] is now closed.
Yes: 14
Veto: 0
Abstain: 0
According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is
sufficient to approve the nomination.
Jon
[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2012-December/001777.html
I hereby nominate Joel Borggrén-Franck to JDK8 Committer.
Joel joined the Langtools team at Oracle a while back, and has already
contributed several changes to the JDK 8 repositories.
In jdk8/tl/langtools:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/376d6c1b49e5
http://hg.openjdk.java.
JDK folk,
jtreg 4.1 b05 is now available, and includes TestNG support for the new
tests appearing in the JDK 8 langtools/ and jdk/ repositories.
For more details, see https://blogs.oracle.com/jjg/
-- Jon
Also note that some IDEs, like NetBeans, already provide the feature you
are looking for, via "editor-fold" comments.
-- Jon
On 12/12/2012 11:55 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
Hi Behrang,
Jon Gibbons has recenly pushed a new API that allow to extract javadoc
comment easily,
so I think with this API y
Vote: yes
Vote: yes
Vote: yes
On 11/23/2012 06:13 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I hereby nominate Mike Duigou to jdk8 Reviewer.
Mike has Committer role on the jdk8, jdk7u, jdk7 and lambda projects.
Mike is author of over 40 changes in the jdk8 forest, has sponsored
several changes from contributors, and has been revi
Vote: yes
JDK 8 folk,
javac currently accepts -target 8, but for convenience has still been
generating v51 class files.
With new features "coming soon", like lambda and type-annotations, we
need to update javac to generate v52 class files.
Is there any reason why we should /not proceed to do so -- i.
Vote: yes
On 10/05/2012 02:21 AM, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
I hereby nominate Robert Field to JDK8 Committer.
Robert works in the Langtools team at Oracle, and has already
contributed several change sets to the Lambda repository. Robert will
be contributing to the integration effort aimed at
On 09/25/2012 12:57 PM, Jim Holmlund wrote:
... even for a new top level package?
Good question. I've been trying to verify this by building with the
new infra but it doesn't work on my PC. I'll figure out some way to
test it.
- jjh
Use Linux? :-)
-- Jon
- jjh
On 9/24/2012 2:07 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
What about corresponding changes to "makefiles/"
-- Jon
On 09/24/2012 12:43 PM, Jim Holmlund wrote:
Please review the fix for CR:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7197401
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.n
What about corresponding changes to "makefiles/"
-- Jon
On 09/24/2012 12:43 PM, Jim Holmlund wrote:
Please review the fix for CR:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7197401
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jjh/7197401/
Thanks
- jjh
Jayashree,
I'll take a look at it. javadoc-dev is the correct place for any
further discussion.
-- Jon
On 09/13/2012 02:33 AM, jayashree viswanathan wrote:
Hi Alan,
True , but I am not seeing any mail conversations there,while I have
posted there as well :-) Any suggestions would really
On 04/13/2012 02:07 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
As for the --with-num-cores, yes, it is a configure time option. The
underlying assumption is that your hardware doesn't really change, and
if your build system is too weak, it will be too weak at configure
time and at all make times. With tha
stem has a model of the project, it will be possible
generate projects configurations for popular IDEs at autoconfig time,
eliminating the need to keep IDE projects in sync with the project
layout.
On 2/21/2012 5:35 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On 02/21/2012 02:10 PM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrot
On 02/21/2012 02:10 PM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/138
- Mark
Many developers use IDEs. It would seem to be a regressive step for
"Support IDE projects" to be a Non Goal.
-- Jon
nical-debt-with-sonar/
Cheers, Steve.
-Original Message- From: Stephen McConnell
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 3:28 AM
To: Jonathan Gibbons
Cc: jdk8-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups
Jonathan:
I would like to see Sonar metrics for the following:
On 12/09/2011 08:40 AM, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Seems we don't' have test coverage in place. Does anyone know if this
is being put in place?
Can you give more details on what you mean or would like to see here?
-- Jon
Metrics are good, especially when you can see trend towards a realistic
goal ;-)
-- Jon
On 12/09/2011 06:48 AM, Stephen McConnell wrote:
If Sonar is in place - then chances are we could enable a 'Technical
Debt' metric.
That would be interesting.
Cheers, Steve.
-Original Message- F
Wow, most impressive!
-- Jon
On 12/08/2011 08:12 PM, Xiomara Jayasena wrote:
Hi,
Last week we held [1] the first (of hopefully several!) JDK8 Warnings Cleanup Days (WCD), where the OpenJDK community collaborated to reduce the number of warnings in the JDK8 source.
We started with just over
On 12/08/2011 12:47 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Hi all,
I think the experiment was pretty successful the other night and Mike
and I have also figured out some ways to
streamline the process even further for future events (pre-built VMs
with the initial build already executed once
work pretty well
On 12/08/2011 12:41 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Hi Alan/All,
On 3 December 2011 15:36, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/12/2011 11:27, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Hi all,
So the recent warnings clean up exercise got me thinking about the
approach we took and how we could make it safer by applying/running
65 matches
Mail list logo
