Apologies, please ignore, missed the u in jdk8u-dev email address.
Paul.
On Mar 24, 2014, at 5:00 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to backport the following that has been approved for 9 to 8u20.
> Patch for 9 currently applies cleanly to 8u20.
>
> Thanks,
Hi,
I would like to backport the following that has been approved for 9 to 8u20.
Patch for 9 currently applies cleanly to 8u20.
Thanks,
Paul.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Paul Sandoz
> Subject: RFR 8037857: Methods j.u.Arrays.spliterator/stream(X[], int, int)
> throw IAE i
On Mar 12, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
>
> As you have seen a lambda is not an anonymous class :)
>
> A non-serializable lambda is more lightweight than an anonymous class so the
> generic information that are transmitted from the bytecode to the runtime
> (the lambda metafactory) are
Hi Pavel,
The second method is a bridge method (m.isBridge() == true).
You can use javap to see the byte code generated by the Java 8 compiler on the
Test.B class:
public void method(java.lang.Object);
flags: ACC_PUBLIC, ACC_BRIDGE, ACC_SYNTHETIC
Code:
stack=2, locals=2, args_si
On Dec 10, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>
> On Dec 10, 2013, at 5:37 AM, Mike Duigou wrote:
>
>> Hello all;
>>
>> I've posted a webrev for review which corrects the problem and adds
>> appropriate tests.
>>
>> http://cr.openjd
On Dec 10, 2013, at 5:37 AM, Mike Duigou wrote:
> Hello all;
>
> I've posted a webrev for review which corrects the problem and adds
> appropriate tests.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8029795/0/webrev/
>
> I also updated the documentation to mention that getOrDefault as well as
Hi Roman,
On Dec 8, 2013, at 10:29 PM, Roman Leventov wrote:
> Especially getDefault(). Doesn't this violate principle of least
> astonishment? Details and proof:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20440136/why-doesnt-new-map-methods-generate-entry-accesses-on-linkedhashmap
>
Thanks. I beli
Vote: yes
Paul.
Vote: yes
Paul.
Vote: yes.
Paul.
Vote: yes
Paul.
Vote: yes
Paul.
Vote: yes
Paul.
[i am not subscribed to compiler-dev]
You are using raw types for the condition:
public class RegexMatch extends Condition
replace with:
public class RegexMatch extends Condition
and it will compile.
So it seems the raw types for the parameter is triggering the compiler to loose
the type
Vote: yes
Paul.
Vote: yes
Paul.
Vote: yes
Paul.
Vote: yes
Paul.
Vote: yes
Paul.
Vote: yes
Paul.
Vote: yes.
Paul.
Vote: yes
Paul.
Vote: yes
Paul.
HI Henri,
I recommend you try this:
- for jdk8 use the "current/old" build system until jdk8 officially switches
over to the new build system and deprecates the old one.
- for jigsaw use the "current/old" build system until jigsaw does a merge from
jdk8 with the new build system that is capabl
Hi,
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/7162262/webrev.0/
The addition of this one character probably produced over 1 fold in
character meta-data :-)
Paul.
On Apr 17, 2012, at 10:10 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 17/04/2012 20:13, Alexander Thaller wrote:
>> Hello.
>> I think that in the ja
25 matches
Mail list logo
