Re: Building openjdk8 on windows 7, nashorn build fails (was: Re: Building openjdk 8 on windows10: i18n problems, linker error)

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Peter Koellner wrote: > Well, the fun did not last too long. Next I tried a "make all", which leads > to the following errorin nashorn/nasgen. Am I working on the wrong > repository version for the latest stable openjdk build? I cloned the jdk8 > tip. > You should

Re: New home for WebRev tool -- will be removed from jdk forest

Hi, I would appreciate if the "Bug id:" could be printed before the "Author comments:" as described in the patch below. The rational is that if he author comments are long (and I think we should encourage everybody to provide good explanations for its webrev) the link to the corresponding bug won

Re: Managing parallel change in JDK 8 and JDK 9

Hi, thanks for your replies. I was only afraid that we would have to go trough a new round of reviews if we have to get new Bug-IDs for every change. But Iris just clarified that we will get a second, JDK 9 staging repository once JDK 9 will be forked. So we will have to down- or up-port our ppc-

Re: Managing parallel change in JDK 8 and JDK 9

Hi Mark, if I understand this right, there's another downside of the approach you propose: you can't easily downport changes from JDK9 to JDK8 update releases. This is because changes in JDK9 (i.e. our ppc-aix-port) will have ancestor changes in JDK9 which are not in JDK8 (i.e. they are there, but

Re: webrev.ksh on Ubuntu 12.04

mplate '{rev}\n' $OUTPWS | sort -n` which seems to cause problems on your site. Maybe Anthony is right and your OUTPWS is somehow miss-detected. Regards, Volker On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Dave Pointon wrote: > Hi Volker , > > On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 10:12 +0100, Volker Simoni

Re: webrev.ksh on Ubuntu 12.04

Does "hg outgoing"/"hg incoming" work? This doesn't seem to be webrev.ksh problem. On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Anthony Petrov wrote: > Hi Dave, > > The .hg/hgrc in your repo seems to have an incorrect default-push path. > Here's mine for example: > > [paths] > default = http://hg.openjdk.j

Re: CFV: New jdk8 Reviewer: Vicente Romero

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > > I hereby nominate Vicente Romero to jdk8 Reviewer. > > Vicente has been a contributor to OpenJDK since 2011, and since > then, he has made a total of 78 contributions and participated in > 38 code reviews, for javac and other tools in t

Re: java -version output for JDK8

This is really just another crazy TM issue. "Java" is a trademark and your not allowed to use it until you've licensed it. In this case the bizarre thing is that the executable (i.e. the launcher itself) is still called "java" even in the OpenJDK and Sun/Oracle obviously could not change that. On

Re: JEP 175: Integrate PowerPC/AIX Port into JDK 8

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Phil Race wrote: > On 2/2/13 3:03 AM, Volker Simonis wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Phil Race wrote: > >> As previously discussed on porters-dev the current target is not the >>> first >>> JDK 8 releas

Re: JEP 175: Integrate PowerPC/AIX Port into JDK 8

On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 1:42 PM, David Holmes wrote: > On 2/02/2013 9:03 PM, Volker Simonis wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Phil Race > <mailto:philip.r...@oracle.com**>> wrote: >> >> As previously discussed on porters-dev the current target is not t

Re: JEP 175: Integrate PowerPC/AIX Port into JDK 8

located (except the Oracle part which I can not speak about:) -phil. > > > On 2/1/2013 5:57 AM, Volker Simonis wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:15 PM, David Holmes ** >> wrote: >> >> On 1/02/2013 8:11 PM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: >>> >>

Re: JEP 175: Integrate PowerPC/AIX Port into JDK 8

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:15 PM, David Holmes wrote: > On 1/02/2013 8:11 PM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: > >> Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/**175 >> > > I'm forced to send this to porters-dev but I do not subscribe to that list > (so it will probably ge

Re: jdk8 Build changes

On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote: > Excuse the wide mailing, but it was important to try and reach anyone > building jdk8. > > The jdk8/build repositories at http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build have > been changed to use the new > build-infra "configure&make" build setup, so i

Re: OpenJDK 8 and fastdebug

kefile. > > Le 20 avr. 2012 à 17:08, Volker Simonis a écrit : > >> Somehow you managed to build a "fastdebug" JDK with a still optimized >> HotSpot VM: >> >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.0-b04, mixed mode) >> >> For -XX:+PrintOptoAssem

Re: OpenJDK 8 and fastdebug

Somehow you managed to build a "fastdebug" JDK with a still optimized HotSpot VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.0-b04, mixed mode) For -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly to work, you need a debug or fastdebug VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 22.0-b01-internal-jvmg, mixed mode) You can easily build

Re: JEP 138: Autoconf-Based Build System

Has anybody thought about how these changes will affect the builds on Windows? I know that JEP 138 mentions a multi-core Linux machine as main target, but I think we should not completely forget about the Windows build because: - as of today, the Windows build are already significantly slower tha

Re: AIX and OpenJDK

I think the prerequisite for a port can not be that there exists access to it on "x86 hardware". With this constraint there will never be an OpenJDK port to other architectures like PPC/Itanium/ARM to name just a few. (By the way, there once upon a time was a mips -porting project http://openjdk.j

Re: AIX and OpenJDK

so I didn't try to build >> it on AIX.    Of course I don't have a problem with someone else giving it >> go! > > I don't have any experiences with Zero to have suggestions, except perhaps > providing access to a machine so that folks in the community could jump in &