Thanks for your examples and explanations.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Mike Duigou wrote:
> The new tags are used in JDK docs but aren't standard javadoc tags. It's
> necessary to use the -tag option to define them so that javadoc tool will
> recognize then in source outside the JDK.
>
>
>
The new tags are used in JDK docs but aren't standard javadoc tags. It's
necessary to use the -tag option to define them so that javadoc tool will
recognize then in source outside the JDK.
On 2014-02-05, at 11:42, Brian Goetz wrote:
> There are some new javadoc tags to let you separate norm
There are some new javadoc tags to let you separate normative from
non-normative, and how it applies separately to the interface vs the
default implementation. They are:
@implSpec -- *specification* about what the default implementation does,
such as "the default implementation throws UOE".
Hi,
I was wondering if there is a way to specify the "default" value returned
by a defender method of an interface that would be processed specifically
by javadoc of Java 8? And, how fair this expectation is or what is the
argument not to have it?
Thanks in advance,
Behrooz
