New Apache db project loosely coupled to Apache JDO

Hi Brian, Geir, I'd like to start a sub-project that JDO needs but don't want to develop it in Apache JDO, because it goes beyond JDO. It is a memory model of relational database schema that can be used for O/R mapping GUI applications for JDO and EJB3, as well as the runtime mapping. Anyway,

Re: New Apache db project loosely coupled to Apache JDO

Makes sense, and might overlap a lot with the DdlUtils stuff. I cc:ed Tom Dudziak who knows a lot about that project. -Brian On Apr 27, 2005, at 12:00 PM, Craig Russell wrote: Hi Brian, Geir, I'd like to start a sub-project that JDO needs but don't want to develop it in Apache JDO, because it

Re: New Apache db project loosely coupled to Apache JDO

Hi Brian, do you have a link to get more details about the DdlUtils stuff? Regards Michael Makes sense, and might overlap a lot with the DdlUtils stuff. I cc:ed Tom Dudziak who knows a lot about that project. -Brian On Apr 27, 2005, at 12:00 PM, Craig Russell wrote: Hi Brian, Geir, I'd like to

Re: Collections of interfaces

Hi, Erik, Does this extension work with SchemaTool also? When I try it I get: JPOX SchemaTool (version 1.1.0-beta-3) : Creation of the schema Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/jdo/tck/pc/fieldtypes/SimpleInterface at

Re: Collections of interfaces

Hi Michelle, On Apr 27, 2005, at 8:40 AM, Michelle Caisse wrote: Hi, Craig, I'm not sure what you mean by map.  Are you referring to Erik's email about using the implementation-classes extension?  I can figure that out, I would think.  I assume it would go into the jdo file and not the orm. I

Re: Collections of interfaces

Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/jdo/tck/pc/fieldtypes/SimpleInterface So it cant find the class SimpleInterface ? extension vendor-name=jpox key=implementation-classes value=org.apache.jdo.tck.pc.fieldtypes.SimpleInterface/ SimpleInterface is an

Re: Collections of interfaces

Hi Michelle, This is confusing. The symptom points to a need to have the SimpleInterface in your class path when you run the enhancer. But if you are enhancing the FieldTypes class, SimpleInterface must be there or you would not be able to load the class to be enhanced. I'd guess you have to

Re: Collections of interfaces

Hi, Responses in-line. Craig Russell wrote: Hi Michelle, On Apr 27, 2005, at 8:40 AM, Michelle Caisse wrote: Hi, Craig, I'm not sure what you mean by map. Are you referring to Erik's email about using the implementation-classes extension? I can figure that out, I would think. I

Re: Collections of interfaces

Craig, thanks, Yes, I needed to have SimpleInterface.class in my classpath. I was running SchemaTool on the enhanced jar in order to have the jdo and classes in one place, but the interface was missing. Fixed that, and I'm off and running. -- Michelle Craig Russell wrote: Hi Michelle, This

Re: New Apache db project loosely coupled to Apache JDO

Hi Thomas, Just today I looked for something like the ddlutils at the apache db web site and came up dry. Thanks for the info. We will be looking at this with keen interest, so let us know (via the alias of course) what it happening! Thanks, Craig On Apr 27, 2005, at 11:05 AM, Thomas Dudziak