TCK : Instanceof

The TCK test Instanceof has an error. It defines 2 queries, yet only 1 set of expected results, ending up with ArrayOutOfBoundsException when trying to get the expected result for the second part. -- Andy

Re: TCK : ImplicitParameters

Hi Andy, check in done (see r330776). Regards Michael Hi Andy, you are right, this is a bug in the test case. I'll change this soon. Regards Michael The TCK test ImplicitParameters has an error currently. The testFilter has a query using firstname = :param. This should be changed to

[jira] Updated: (JDO-163) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning query API Extensions

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-163?page=all ] Michael Watzek updated JDO-163: --- Attachment: JDO-163.patch2 The second patch implements the comments above. Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning query API Extensions

Re: JPOX bug related to pk fields of type Date

Hi Andy, the fix works fine. Thanks, Michael Hi Michael, Please have a look. Did that and its now fixed in JPOX CVS. -- Andy -- --- Michael Watzek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL

[jira] Closed: (JDO-198) TestArrayCollections java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: out of field index :28

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-198?page=all ] Michelle Caisse closed JDO-198: --- Fixed. Back to original problem as per JDO-98. TestArrayCollections java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: out of field index :28

Re: TCK : Instanceof

Hi Michael, thanks for your changes. I don't understand why you changed the expected result to be emp3, emp4. The query is looking for Employees that have a mentor field that is PartTimeEmployee. That means that it should return emp2 and emp3. The query is *not* which employees *are*

Re: TCK : Instanceof

Hi Andy, Hi Michael, thanks for your changes. I don't understand why you changed the expected result to be emp3, emp4. The query is looking for Employees that have a mentor field that is PartTimeEmployee. That means that it should return emp2 and emp3. The query is *not* which employees *are*

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-173) JPOX does not support instanceof operator

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-173?page=all ] Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-173: Resolution: Fixed Implemented in JPOX CVS. Test passes with builds dated 05/11/2005 or later JPOX does not support instanceof operator

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Nov 4, 9 am PST

1. Test status (Michael W) 6 configs fail of 28. alltests: 5 F 15 E / 448 app ds identity 2. Query tests (Michael W) MW submitted second patch for JDO-163. Continued working on 164. Need improved result check for floats Methods should be generic and available to other tests outside

Issue 137: Add metadata to describe array element-type

Javadogs, Currently there is no metadata that allows deployment to specify a more specific type for the elements of an array. This is needed in cases where the array is a generic type or an interface type and the actual type is known at deployment time. Proposal: !ATTLIST array

Issue 138: Add more standard supportedOptions

Javadogs, We need a way to determine whether a JDO implementation supports various mapping features. Specifically: Heterogeneous collections with new-class mapping of subclasses Mapping fields of Object type and interface types Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System

[jira] Commented: (JDO-98) TestArrayCollections: Field ArrayOfBigDecimal13 in class ArrayCollections has been defined with elements that arent embedded. JPOX doesnt support this

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-98?page=comments#action_12356815 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-98: -- Issue 137 has been raised on the JDO expert group to allow specification of element-type for array. This will allow us to specify

Re: TCK : jdoql.operator.NotEquals

Hi Andy, you are right, NotEquals is comparing floating point values using != and in general this is not a good idea (BTW, the same holds true for class Equality). This is a old test that came from JDO1 and AFAIK it has not been changed since then. So I'm wondering why it is failing now.

[jira] Created: (JDO-202) orm.xsd and unit tests for xsd are missing

orm.xsd and unit tests for xsd are missing -- Key: JDO-202 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-202 Project: JDO Type: Bug Components: api20 Reporter: Michelle Caisse Assigned to: Michael Bouschen The xsd

[jira] Created: (JDO-203) Remove vendor extensions from TCK metadata

Remove vendor extensions from TCK metadata -- Key: JDO-203 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-203 Project: JDO Type: Bug Components: tck20 Reporter: Michelle Caisse Assigned to: Michelle Caisse For

[jira] Created: (JDO-204) Need attribute on field element for type

Need attribute on field element for type Key: JDO-204 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-204 Project: JDO Type: Bug Components: api20 Reporter: Michelle Caisse Assigned to: Craig Russell Need to supply

[jira] Created: (JDO-205) Write new test case for mapping Object and SimpleInterface without specifying their specific type

Write new test case for mapping Object and SimpleInterface without specifying their specific type - Key: JDO-205 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-205 Project: JDO

Re: svn commit: r330804 - /incubator/jdo/trunk/tck20/test/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/query/jdoql/variables/VariablesWithoutExtent.java

Javadogs, Did we really intend for the single string version of JDOQL to include IMPORTS import...? setFilter(SELECT e FROM EMPLOYEE e WHERE e.grade HardClass.HIGHEST_GRADE); declareImports(import org.apache.jdo.tck.SimpleClass; import org.apache.jdo.tck.HardClass; pm.newQuery(SELECT

[jira] Closed: (JDO-201) TestArrayListCollections ClassCastException

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-201?page=all ] Michelle Caisse closed JDO-201: --- Resolution: Fixed revision 330953 Also added code block with logic to test BigDecimal fields. TestArrayListCollections ClassCastException

[jira] Created: (JDO-206) JDOQL test NotEquals comparing floating point numbers

JDOQL test NotEquals comparing floating point numbers - Key: JDO-206 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-206 Project: JDO Type: Bug Components: tck20 Reporter: Andy Jefferson The current TCK