[jira] Resolved: (JDO-268) org.apache.jdo.tck.api.instancecallbacks.InstanceLifecycleListenerAttach fails with new definition of makePersistent instead of attachCopy

2005-12-29 Thread Andy Jefferson (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-268?page=all ] Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-268: Resolution: Fixed attachCopy() just met a horrible death in JPOX CVS. There'll be a short service later to commemorate its brief life (don't send any

Re: Clarification needed on class names in query filters

2005-12-29 Thread Michael Bouschen
Hi Craig, [...] I like your proposal: ... members of the candidate class, or they are qualified by the class and can be resolved to a static field of that name in the specified class. Please note this includes that the the class qualifier might be a fully qualified class name. So for

RE: Successful w/dsid, error w/appid running detach.list?

2005-12-29 Thread Matthew T. Adams
: /Users/clr/apachejdo/jdo/trunk/tck20/target/enhanced/jdori/datastoreidentity .jar [jar] Building jar: /Users/clr/apachejdo/jdo/trunk/tck20/target/enhanced/jdori/datastoreidentity .jar privateRuntck.jdori: [mkdir] Created dir: /Users/clr/apachejdo/jdo/trunk/tck20/target/logs/20051229-132415

RE: Successful w/dsid, error w/appid running detach.list?

2005-12-29 Thread Matthew T. Adams
: /Users/clr/apachejdo/jdo/trunk/tck20/target/enhanced/jdori/data storeidentity .jar privateRuntck.jdori: [mkdir] Created dir: /Users/clr/apachejdo/jdo/trunk/tck20/target/logs/20051229-132415 [echo] Run all configurations on jdori exclude: doRuntck.jdori: [java] Cannot find test class

Re: Successful w/dsid, error w/appid running detach.list?

2005-12-29 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Matthew,On Dec 29, 2005, at 1:46 PM, Matthew T. Adams wrote:Oops, forgot to quote the trunk/readme.txt file: Command Line Options:     -Djdo.tck.cfglist=configuration file list           Overrides test/conf/configuration.list by supplying           one or more space-separated test

Re: User demand and Issue 150. [was Re: Issue 150: Consistency requirements for relationships with mapped-by]

2005-12-29 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi David,First, let me say that I admire your passion. I wish that all expert group members were thus.I do have a quibble with your counter example below. Your code ignores the return boolean value from  this.lines.add(line). What value would you return if the collection were not loaded? CraigOn

Re: Clarification needed on class names in query filters

2005-12-29 Thread Michael Bouschen
Hi Craig, Hi Michael, Could you please try to rewrite the proposal including the class name bit that you identified below? For some reason, I'm having a hard time with it. sure, I will try to rewrite. But I would like clarify first whether JDOQL should support fully qualified class names

Re: User demand and Issue 150. [was Re: Issue 150: Consistency requirements for relationships with mapped-by]

2005-12-29 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Erik,For the record, the quoted lines are not mine. Credit where credit is due. The quoted lines are David Bullock's.More comments below.On Dec 29, 2005, at 3:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Quoting Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]: public class Invoice {  private SetLine lines;  public void