[jira] Assigned: (JDO-343) JPOX regression: after deserializing a detached instance, the instance is transient

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-343?page=all ] Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-343: -- Assign To: Andy Jefferson (was: Erik Bengtson) > JPOX regression: after deserializing a detached instance, the instance is > transient >

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-343) JPOX regression: after deserializing a detached instance, the instance is transient

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-343?page=all ] Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-343: Resolution: Fixed Fixed in JPOX CVS ... again. RIP. > JPOX regression: after deserializing a detached instance, the instance is > transient > --

[jira] Commented: (JDO-345) MethodsAndObjectConstructionNotSupported (A14.6.2-8) should allow getX()

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-345?page=comments#action_12371473 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-345: -- I agree we should drop the test from the TCK. It might make sense to have a negative test case with a query calling a mutating meth

[jira] Commented: (JDO-345) MethodsAndObjectConstructionNotSupported (A14.6.2-8) should allow getX()

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-345?page=comments#action_12371478 ] Ilan Kirsh commented on JDO-345: I also think that this test should be dropped. A negative test might cause a new problem - how the implementation can check if a method is mutati

[jira] Commented: (JDO-345) MethodsAndObjectConstructionNotSupported (A14.6.2-8) should allow getX()

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-345?page=comments#action_12371488 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-345: --- I think a word about why we used the term "mutating method" is in order here. The expert group did not want to allow the user and implemen

Re: serialize Detachable instance for storage

Hi Erik, On Mar 17, 2006, at 11:40 AM, Erik Bengtson wrote: Hi, If we serialize a detachable instance for storage, does it have the detach state populated? Yes. Regardless of whether it's currently managed or already detached, the detached state is part of the serialized state of the

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-258) Write tests for new persistent-nontransactional-dirty lifecycle assertions

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-258?page=all ] Martin Zaun resolved JDO-258: - Resolution: Fixed Combined patch for JDO-275 and JDO-258 committed with revision 388087. > Write tests for new persistent-nontransactional-dirty lifecycle assertio

[jira] Updated: (JDO-258) Write tests for new persistent-nontransactional-dirty lifecycle assertions

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-258?page=all ] Martin Zaun updated JDO-258: Comment: was deleted > Write tests for new persistent-nontransactional-dirty lifecycle assertions > ---

[jira] Commented: (JDO-258) Write tests for new persistent-nontransactional-dirty lifecycle assertions

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-258?page=comments#action_12371519 ] Martin Zaun commented on JDO-258: - Combined patch for JDO-275 and JDO-258 committed with revision 388087. > Write tests for new persistent-nontransactional-dirty lifecycle assert

[jira] Updated: (JDO-258) Write tests for new persistent-nontransactional-dirty lifecycle assertions

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-258?page=all ] Martin Zaun updated JDO-258: Comment: was deleted > Write tests for new persistent-nontransactional-dirty lifecycle assertions > ---

[jira] Commented: (JDO-258) Write tests for new persistent-nontransactional-dirty lifecycle assertions

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-258?page=comments#action_12371520 ] Martin Zaun commented on JDO-258: - Combined patch for JDO-273 and JDO-258 committed with revision 388087. > Write tests for new persistent-nontransactional-dirty lifecycle assert