[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-273?page=all ]
Martin Zaun resolved JDO-273:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Combined patch for JDO-273 and JDO-258 committed with revision 388087.
The patch is based on Michael Watzek's patch for JDO-273 with a couple of
Cleanup and refactorize lifecycle tests StateTransitions and
StateTransitionsReturnedObjects
Key: JDO-346
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-346
Project: JDO
JPOX fails some lifecycle tests
---
Key: JDO-347
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-347
Project: JDO
Type: Bug
Components: tck20
Reporter: Martin Zaun
The integration of fixes for JDO-273 and JDO-258 has added (and
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-347?page=all ]
Martin Zaun updated JDO-347:
Attachment: errors_state_transition_argument_instances.txt
Attached error messages for failing tests lifecycle.StateTransitions (= state
transitions of argument
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-347?page=all ]
Martin Zaun updated JDO-347:
Attachment: errors_state_transition_returned_instances.txt
Attached error messages for failing test
lifecycle.StateTransitionsReturnedObjects (= states of returned
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-273?page=comments#action_12371528 ]
Martin Zaun commented on JDO-273:
-
- File a jpox issue on the failing state transitions for argument instances
(29 errors)
and returned instances (19 errors).
Filed as
After a svn update, fostore20 doesn't compile anymore in my workspace.
Just me?
Martin
java:compile:
[echo] Compiling to g:\olsen\jdo\apache_clean\jdo\trunk\fostore20/target/cla
sses
[javac] Compiling 100 source files to G:\olsen\jdo\apache_clean\jdo\trunk\fo
store20\target\classes
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-346?page=comments#action_12371559 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-346:
When I do a clean check out and then run the TCK, when it is running
lifecycle.conf I get an error
Cannot find test class
Hi Andy,
yes, it look slike lifecycle.conf lists StateTransitionsReturnedObjects
which has not yet been checked in.
Regards Michael
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-346?page=comments#action_12371559 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-346:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-347?page=comments#action_12371574 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-347:
For information : JPOX CVS cuts the long list of failing transitions attached
to this issue down to
[java] Assertions A5.9-1
The fostore20 project hasn't been updated for the last changes in the
api. The problem is actually in runtime20. I've filed JDO-348 for this.
Craig
On Mar 23, 2006, at 12:38 AM, Martin Zaun wrote:
After a svn update, fostore20 doesn't compile anymore in my workspace.
Just me?
Martin
Fostore20 doesn't compile with latest changes to api20
--
Key: JDO-348
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-348
Project: JDO
Type: Bug
Components: runtime20
Versions: JDO 2 rc1
Reporter:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-273?page=comments#action_12371588 ]
Martin Zaun commented on JDO-273:
-
Sorry for the missing class
src/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/lifecycle/StateTransitionsReturnedObjects.java.
Checked in with revision 388211.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-346?page=comments#action_12371589 ]
Martin Zaun commented on JDO-346:
-
I'm sorry for the missing class
src/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/lifecycle/StateTransitionsReturnedObjects.java
(had some problems with svn locks
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-347?page=comments#action_12371594 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-347:
org.apache.jdo.tck.lifecycle.StateTransitionsReturnedObjects :-
This test seems to think that calling detachCopy on a detached instance
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-347?page=comments#action_12371599 ]
Craig Russell commented on JDO-347:
---
This is an inconsistency in the spec. The spec also says that the reachability
algorithm is run on the graph of instances and this will
Hi Craig,
On Mar 17, 2006, at 11:40 AM, Erik Bengtson wrote:
Hi,
If we serialize a detachable instance for storage, does it have the
detach state
populated?
Yes. Regardless of whether it's currently managed or already
detached, the detached state is part of the serialized state of
Hi,
I have not. If someone validates the schema against Oracle, I would run tck
against JPOX and report issues.
Quoting Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Javadogs,
I'd like to be sure we know how to configure a JPOX TCK run for
Oracle. Has anyone done this?
The only issue I know of is
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-347?page=comments#action_12371626 ]
Craig Russell commented on JDO-347:
---
It might be useful here to review the process of detachCopy.
First, the instances in the parameter list are made persistent as if
Hi,
We will have our regular meeting Friday, March 24 at 9 am PST to discuss
JDO TCK issues and status.
Dial-in numbers are:
866 230-6968 294-0479#
International: +1 865 544-7856
Agenda:
1. Test status (Michael)
2. New tests status (Martin, Michael, Craig)
3. JSR 243 next steps (Craig)
4.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-348?page=all ]
Martin Zaun reassigned JDO-348:
---
Assign To: Martin Zaun
Fostore20 doesn't compile with latest changes to api20
--
Key: JDO-348
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-348?page=all ]
Martin Zaun updated JDO-348:
Attachment: FOStorePM.newMakeTransient.patch
Looking for a quick fix for this compilation issue, I've attached a patch.
My thoughts:
- The implementation of the new
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-348?page=comments#action_12371662 ]
Craig Russell commented on JDO-348:
---
My preference is to put these methods into the runtime implementation of
PersistenceManagerImpl. I don't feel strongly but I'm expecting
23 matches
Mail list logo
